A phase IB dose-finding trial of liposomal doxorubicin in combination with capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (I.R.S.T.), Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, FC, Italy.

Published: April 2010

Purpose: Anthracyclines and fluoropyrimidines are very active in breast cancer, while liposomal doxorubicin has low cardiotoxicity. We conducted a dose-finding study of the combination of liposomal doxorubicin and capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Patients And Methods: Patients received liposomal doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid (level 0) or 1,000 mg/m2 bid (level 1) on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and cardiac safety.

Results: Nine patients were enrolled and a total of 52 courses were delivered (median 6 cycles per patient [range 4-7]). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 15% of cycles, with one episode of febrile neutropenia; most nonhematological toxicities were mild or moderate. No formal MTD was established, and the study was closed because two cardiac events were observed at dose level 1 and another at dose level 0 in patients pretreated with epirubicin > or = 560 mg/m2.

Conclusions: The recommended dose for phase II studies is liposomal doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2/bid on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. Despite the lower cardiotoxicity of liposomal doxorubicin, the risk of cardiac damage persists in anthracycline-pretreated individuals and mandates close cardiac monitoring and careful evaluation of the overall cumulative dose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1092-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liposomal doxorubicin
24
patients pretreated
12
capecitabine patients
8
pretreated metastatic
8
metastatic breast
8
breast cancer
8
doxorubicin mg/m2
8
mg/m2 day
8
day capecitabine
8
capecitabine 825
8

Similar Publications

Doxorubicin or Epirubicin Versus Liposomal Doxorubicin Therapy-Differences in Cardiotoxicity.

Cardiovasc Toxicol

January 2025

Chair and Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1b, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an important drug used in the treatment of many malignancies. Unfortunately DOX causes various side effects, with cardiotoxicity being the most characteristic. Risk factors for DOX induced cardiotoxicity (DIC) include cumulative dose of DOX, preexisting cardiovascular diseases, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, along with the use of other cardiotoxic agents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Liposomal doxorubicin (Dox), a treatment option for recurrent ovarian cancer, often suffers from suboptimal biodistribution and efficacy, which might be addressed with precision drug delivery systems. Here, we introduce a catheter-based endoscopic probe designed for multispectral, quantitative monitoring of light-triggered drug release. This tool utilizes red-light photosensitive porphyrin-phospholipid (PoP), which is encapsulated in liposome bilayers to enhance targeted drug delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Liposomal doxorubicin (Dox), a treatment option for recurrent ovarian cancer, often suffers from suboptimal biodistribution and efficacy, which might be addressed with precision drug delivery systems. Here, we introduce a catheter-based endoscopic probe designed for multispectral, quantitative monitoring of light-triggered drug release. This tool utilizes red-light photosensitive porphyrin-phospholipid (PoP), which is encapsulated in liposome bilayers to enhance targeted drug delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This study aims to compare the efficiencies and toxicities of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) based and epirubicin based chemotherapeutic regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for early breast cancer.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 391 patients with stage II-III breast cancer who received NAC in multiple centers. The efficiencies and toxicities of PLD and epirubicin based NAC regimens were compared by using both propensity-score matched (PSM) and unmatched data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to analyze the cost differences of treating gynaecological cancer in India by comparing the prices of the most and least expensive branded drugs available.
  • The researchers conducted a conventional pharmacoeconomic study, assessing both branded drugs and those from Jan Aushadhi stores to determine cost variations and potential savings.
  • Findings revealed significant cost disparities, particularly with certain regimens, indicating that cheaper alternatives could lead to substantial savings for patients without sacrificing treatment options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!