Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To assess the relationship between MRI derived parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 relaxation time) and tumor cellularity as determined from whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens, for both prostatic carcinoma and normal peripheral zone tissue.
Materials And Methods: Over a 16-month period, 20 patients (mean age: 61 years, range: 42-70 years) were prospectively recruited. Diffusion and T2 imaging were performed on a 3.0 Tesla scanner to enable subsequent ADC and T2 calculation. After radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens were whole-mounted and regions of interest (ROIs) drawn in areas of prostatic carcinoma and normal peripheral zone. Cell density was then determined using an adaptive histogram thresholding technique. Differences in tissue type were explored using the unpaired t test while the relationship between parameters was assessed using scatter-plots and the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: Significant differences (P < 0.0001 in all cases) were noted between peripheral zone tissue and prostatic carcinoma in terms of ADC (1.88 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.43 +/- 0.19 x 10(-3) mm2/s), T2 (142 +/- 24 vs. 109 +/- 20 milliseconds), and cell density (9.4% +/- 3.0% vs. 19.8% +/- 5.3%). A significant negative correlation with cell density was noted for both ADC (R = -0.695, P < 0.0001) and T2 (R = -0.505, P = 0.001). Trends for increased cell density, decreased ADC, and decreased T2 with increasing Gleason score were also noted.
Conclusions: ADC and to a lesser extent T2 are good indicators of cell density. Because of the potential link with Gleason score, MRI derived parameters may have a prognostic role with regard to potential metastatic activity and tumor aggressiveness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c10e | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!