3.14.248.199=3.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=19687075&retmode=xml&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b49083.14.248.199=3.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=periosteal+autograft&datetype=edat&usehistory=y&retmax=5&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908
In this study, the effects of periosteal autograft and human amniotic membrane on tendon healing were compared. Forty-two New Zealand rabbits were divided into three groups. Flexor digitorum fibularis tendons were cut and repaired with a modified Kessler technique and circumferential sutures in all groups. Tendon repair alone was carried out in group 1, tendon repair and application of human amniotic membrane was done in group 2 and tendon repair and application of periosteal autograft was done in group 3. Biomechanical and histopathological examinations were done 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Biomechanical examination showed that group 3 was the strongest at weeks 2 and 6. Adhesion, inflammation and new bone formation showed no difference between groups at week 2. However, adhesion formation was found to be less in groups 2 and 3 than group 1 at week 6. The application of periosteal autograft might be useful in repair of tendon injuries.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753193409337961 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!