[Feasibility of implementing a learning based problem solving and peer evaluation approach among medical students in Mexico].

Objective: Assess the degree to which medical students accept and consider useful the techniques of problem based learning (PBL) and evaluation among peers. Analyze the association between the number of PBL clinical cases reviewed and the students' perception about their own learning in a basic course.

Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 334 students enrolled in the third semester of medical school (Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México). Questions included acceptability of PBL, peer evaluation, and their perception about the usefulness of these techniques after having used them during the school year. We used a Likert scale to measure opinions on the degree of usefulness of the PBL, perception of their own learning, and the acceptance of the notion that evaluation activities evaluation among peers promote justice and favor the student's character formation. We measured the association of these variables with the number of clinical cases studied using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Results: Most of the students considered that PBL method is useful (82%) and that evaluation activities among peers promote justice and character formation (70%). Students who reviewed more PBL cases considered the PBL activities more useful (rho = 0.489, p < 0.0001), and perceived that they achieved a better learning experience (rho = 0.200, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Results show a fair acceptance by the students of the PBL method and activities of peer evaluation. The number of clinical cases reviewed during the course correlated with considering the PBL to be a useful method and perceiving a better learning experience. Our results support the inclusion of PBL and peer evaluation in the medical school curricula.