Lubinus SP II stems are cemented either line-to-line with the largest broach or one-size undersized. The purpose of this study was to compare both implantation techniques. We used 18 polymeric stem replicas cemented line-to-line and undersized in paired cadaveric femora and analyzed them with CT scan images. Cementing Lubinus stems line-to-line resulted in higher medullary canal-filling indices (28.26 +/- 4.10%), thinner cement mantles (3.29 +/- 0.40 mm), more cement defects (5.12 +/- 1.69%) and more areas of thin cement (23.81 +/- 7.13%) than undersizing (respectively: 23.61 +/- 4.24%, 3.62 +/- 0.43 mm, 1.48 +/- 2.04%, 15.11 +/- 5.93%). In both settings, over 80% of areas of thin or deficient cement were supported by cortex. Using a line-to-line technique, adequate stem alignment was achieved without distal centralizer. Undersizing the stem and using a distal centralizer reduced the incidence of distal cement defects by a factor 10. While stems cemented line-to-line might have mechanical advantages, undersizing and using distal centralizers reduced potential pathways for debris migration to the bone-cement interface.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lubinus stems
12
cemented line-to-line
12
stems cemented
8
+/-
8
cement defects
8
areas thin
8
distal centralizer
8
cement
6
line-to-line
5
impact stem-broach
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the revision rates of the Lubinus SPII-stem used in hemi-arthroplasties for femoral neck fractures, comparing three head types: Variocup, Unipolar Head (UH), and the newly introduced Modular Trauma Head (MTH).
  • Data was collected from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register, including 33,059 patients from 2005 to 2021, with follow-up periods of up to 10 years for Variocup and UH, and 2 years for MTH. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to assess outcomes.
  • Findings showed similar revision rates at 2 years across groups (3.1%-3.5%) and
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Aseptic loosening is one of the leading causes of stem revision. Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis allows for the detection of distal stem migration, which is used as a predictive factor for implant longevity. This study aims to demonstrate the migration behavior of a cemented collared anatomical stem.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Experience of an anatomic femoral stem in a UK orthopaedic centre beyond 20 years of follow-up.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

May 2024

National Treatment Centre Fife Orthopaedics, Victoria Hospital, Hayfield Road, Kirkcaldy, KY2 5AH, Scotland, UK.

Introduction: Increasing interest in the use of anatomical stems has developed as the prevalence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) continues to increase. The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship and PPF rate of an anatomical femoral stem in a single UK centre.

Patients And Methods: Between 2000 and 2002, 94 consecutive THAs were performed using the 170 mm Lubinus SP II anatomical femoral stem in our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The choice between cemented or uncemented stem fixation in the treatment of a femoral neck fracture may influence patient rehabilitation and the resulting gait pattern, due to potential differences in implant positioning and fixation. We used gait analysis to study temporal gait parameters, hip kinematics and kinetics in patients who, 2 years previously, had been randomised to treatment with a cemented or uncemented stem and due to an acute femoral neck fracture.

Methods: 45 Patients implanted with a cemented Lubinus SP II ( = 29) and an uncemented ( = 16) Corail stem were studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In this article, an overview and comparison of the most commonly used cemented hip stems, grouped into different stem types and cement mantle thickness, is given to see which combination performs well.

Methodology: Revision rates of cemented stem types were categorized from the Endoprosthesis Register-Germany, and 3‑ and 5‑year revision rates were reported and analyzed. For the research, the focus was on the Exeter, C‑Stem, MS-30, Excia, Bicontact, Charnley, Müller straight stem, Twinsys, Corail, Avenir, Quadra, and the Lubinus SP II stems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!