Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To study the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at 3 different scan diameters using GDxVCC in healthy, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) suspects, and early POAG.
Method: RNFL parameters were evaluated in 100 normal subjects, 50 POAG suspects, and 50 early POAG patients using GDxVCC at conventional small, medium, and large circle. TSNIT (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal) average, superior average, inferior average RNFL thickness, and nerve fiber indicator (NFI) were evaluated.
Results: The TSNIT average (microm) in normal subjects, POAG suspects, and POAG at 3 different circles was 54.17+/-4.6, 49.96+/-6.5, 46.92+/-6.2 (small); 47.17+/-4.8, 43.79+/-5.7, 41.48+/-6.5 (medium); and 41.57+/-4.6, 39.77+/-5.9, 38.33+/-7.1 (large). All RNFL parameters at all circles showed significant difference between normal and early POAG eyes (P<0.001). Area under the curve was 0.911 for NFI at all circles. All parameters at small and medium circle, all except TSNIT average at large circle showed significant difference between normal and POAG suspects (P<0.001), area under curve being the highest (0.780 to 0.801 at 3 circles) for NFI. All parameters progressively decreased with increasing diameter with significant difference between small-medium (P<0.001), medium-large (P<0.001), and small-large circle results (P<0.001) in all the groups for all parameters except NFI.
Conclusions: Medium and large circles can also be used for RNFL evaluation in glaucoma. NFI is the best discriminating measure across all scan diameters.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181895e2b | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!