A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by scanning laser polarimetry (GDxVCC) at conventional and modified diameter scans in normals, glaucoma suspects, and early glaucoma patients. | LitMetric

Purpose: To study the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at 3 different scan diameters using GDxVCC in healthy, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) suspects, and early POAG.

Method: RNFL parameters were evaluated in 100 normal subjects, 50 POAG suspects, and 50 early POAG patients using GDxVCC at conventional small, medium, and large circle. TSNIT (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal) average, superior average, inferior average RNFL thickness, and nerve fiber indicator (NFI) were evaluated.

Results: The TSNIT average (microm) in normal subjects, POAG suspects, and POAG at 3 different circles was 54.17+/-4.6, 49.96+/-6.5, 46.92+/-6.2 (small); 47.17+/-4.8, 43.79+/-5.7, 41.48+/-6.5 (medium); and 41.57+/-4.6, 39.77+/-5.9, 38.33+/-7.1 (large). All RNFL parameters at all circles showed significant difference between normal and early POAG eyes (P<0.001). Area under the curve was 0.911 for NFI at all circles. All parameters at small and medium circle, all except TSNIT average at large circle showed significant difference between normal and POAG suspects (P<0.001), area under curve being the highest (0.780 to 0.801 at 3 circles) for NFI. All parameters progressively decreased with increasing diameter with significant difference between small-medium (P<0.001), medium-large (P<0.001), and small-large circle results (P<0.001) in all the groups for all parameters except NFI.

Conclusions: Medium and large circles can also be used for RNFL evaluation in glaucoma. NFI is the best discriminating measure across all scan diameters.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181895e2bDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nerve fiber
12
suspects early
12
poag suspects
12
retinal nerve
8
fiber layer
8
gdxvcc conventional
8
rnfl parameters
8
normal subjects
8
subjects poag
8
early poag
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!