Unlabelled: This double-blind randomized clinical trial compared different ethanol/water and acetone-based systems in non-carious cervical lesions over 36 months.
Materials And Methods: Eighty-four patients having at least one non-carious cervical lesion [NCCL] under occlusion were enrolled in this study. A total of 84 restorations were placed, half for each group (Adper Single Bond [SB] + FiltekA110 or One Step [OS] + MicroNew). All the materials were placed by two calibrated operators. Two other independent examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 36 months, according to slightly modified USPHS criteria. Statistical analysis between materials in each period was conducted using the Fisher's exact test (alpha=0.05), and performance of the materials in the baseline in comparison to each period was evaluated by McNemar's test (alpha=0.05).
Results: The 12-, 18- and 36-month retention rates for SB were 95.2% (12 and 18 months) and 92.3% (36 months). For OS, the retention rates were 83.3%, 73.8% and 56.4%, respectively, for each recall period. After 36 months, 10 OS restorations (25.7%) and seven SB restorations (17.9%) were rated as Bravo in the marginal discoloration item.
Conclusions: The ethanol/water-based adhesive (Single Bond) that was evaluated showed a higher retention rate than the acetone-based system (One Step) after 36 months of clinical service.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/08-117 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
November 2024
College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Erosive tooth wear (ETW) is a prevalent oral condition with varying etiology, including erosion, abrasion, abfraction, and attrition. It is reported in the literature in different nomenclatures, hindering the ability to identify the emerging trends and influential scholarly works and bodies within this field. Using a bibliometric analysis approach, this study aims to evaluate the trends, themes, and productivity of the research on ETW condition while respecting its different terminologies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
December 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Objective: To evaluate the 36-month clinical performance of Single Bond Universal Adhesive (SBU; 3M ESPE, Germany) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using different modes of adhesion according to the FDI criteria. The primary outcome was the retention loss of the restorations, while the secondary outcomes included marginal staining, marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity and tooth vitality, recurrence of caries erosion and abfraction, and tooth integrity, all evaluated according to the FDI criteria.
Materials And Methods: In this study, the SBU Adhesive was applied to 246 NCCLs of 25 patients using different modes of adhesion: Self-etch (SE), selective-enamel-etching (SLE), and etch-and-rinse (ER).
J Dent
December 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ponta Grossa State University, Avenida General Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Odontologia, Universidad De Los Hemisferios, Quito, Ecuador.
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance of a universal adhesive system containing 0.1 % copper nanoparticles (CuNp) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 6 years.
Material And Methods: Two hundred and sixteen restorations (n = 54) were randomly placed in 36 participants with at least four NCCLs.
J Dent
December 2024
Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University. José Bonifácio St. 1193, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil. Electronic address:
Objective: To evaluate the retention rate and other clinical criteria of four different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) after 4 years.
Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and split-mouth study evaluating four different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: adhesive restorative system (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive/Filtek Z350XT) without (SBU) and with selective enamel acid-etching (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic as acid pretreatment (E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations were placed in 50 patients.
J Dent
December 2024
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Odontologia, Universidad De Los Hemisferios, Quito, Ecuador; Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Avenida Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, Bloco M, Sala 04, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil. Electronic address:
Objective: This double-blind, split-mouth, randomized equivalence clinical trial aimed to evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of an ormocer-based single-shade resin composite compared with an ormocer-based multi-shade resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
Methods: One hundred and twenty restorations were performed on NCCLs with two restorative materials (n = 60): Admira Fusion X-tra resin composite (ormocer-based single-shade), and Admira Fusion resin composite (ormocer-based multi-shade). After rubber dam isolation, a universal adhesive was applied in the selective enamel etching strategy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!