Background: Until now, cell therapy has constituted a passive therapeutic approach; the only effects seem to be related to the reduction of the myocardial fibrosis and the limitation of the adverse ventricular remodeling. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is indicated in patients with heart failure to correct conduction disorders associated with chronic systolic and diastolic dysfunction. The association of electrostimulation with cellular cardiomyoplasty could be a way to transform passive cell therapy into "dynamic cellular support." Electrostimulation of ventricles following skeletal myoblast implantation should induce the contraction of the transplanted cells and a higher expression of slow myosin, which is better adapted for chronic ventricular assistance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate myogenic cell transplantation in an ischemic heart model associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Methods: Twenty two sheep were included. All animals underwent myocardial infarction by ligation of 2 coronary artery branches (distal left anterior descending artery and D2). After 4 weeks, autologous cultured myoblasts were injected in the infarcted areas with or without pacemaker implantation. Atrial synchronized biventricular pacing was performed using epicardial electrodes. Echocardiography was performed at 4 weeks (baseline) and 12 weeks after infarction.

Results: Echocardiography showed a significant improvement in ejection fraction and limitation of left ventricular dilatation in cell therapy with cardiac resynchronization therapy as compared with the other groups. Viable cells were identified in the infarcted areas. Differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes and enhanced expression of slow myosin heavy chain was observed in the electrostimulated group. Transplantation of cells with cardiac resynchronization therapy caused an increase in diastolic wall thickening in the infarcted zone relative to cells-only group and cardiac resynchronization therapy-only group.

Conclusions: Biventricular pacing seems to induce synchronous contraction of transplanted myoblasts and the host myocardium, thus improving ventricular function. Electrostimulation was related with enhanced expression of slow myosin and the organization of myoblasts in myotubes, which are better adapted at performing cardiac work. Patients with heart failure presenting myocardial infarct scars and indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy might benefit from simultaneous cardiac pacing and cell therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.02.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac resynchronization
24
cell therapy
16
resynchronization therapy
16
expression slow
12
slow myosin
12
association electrostimulation
8
cell transplantation
8
transplantation ischemic
8
ischemic heart
8
therapy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Coronary sinus (CS) lead placement in persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) cases is challenging because of the poor backup force of the guiding catheter within the enlarged CS. Active fixation Quadripolar leads (Attain Stability™ Quad 4798, Medtronic) can expand choice to CS branches with limited access; however, no cases of anchoring to the main body of the CS have been published to date.

Case Summary: We describe a case of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker upgrade in a 79-year-old female who developed pacing-induced cardiomyopathy after pacemaker implantation via the right superior vena cava (SVC) for atrioventricular block eight years ago wherein PLSVC was revealed during the procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Leadless Pacing: Current Status and Ongoing Developments.

Micromachines (Basel)

January 2025

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Although significant strides have been made in cardiac pacing, the field is still evolving. While transvenous permanent pacing is highly effective in the management of bradyarrhythmias, it is not risk free and may result in significant morbidity and, rarely, mortality. Transvenous leads are often the weakest link in a pacing system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area DF-4 Defibrillator Lead Implantation-Feasibility, Procedural Caveats, Safety, and Follow-Up.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol

January 2025

Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Arrhythmia Heart Failure Academy, The Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Introduction: Permanent implantation of a DF-4 implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) lead in the left bundle branch area (LBBA-ICD) is the next paradigm in amalgamating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and defibrillation. We systematically investigated feasibility/success rate, procedural caveats, and complications associated with a permanent DF-4 LBBA ICD implant and pertinent data at short-term follow-up.

Methods: We prospectively attempted implantation of 7 Fr Durata (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) single coil DF-4 ICD lead at the LBBA using a fixed-curve non-deflectable CPS locator delivery sheath.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an intervention for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction who exhibit specific electrocardiographic indicators of electrical dyssynchrony. However, electrical dyssynchrony does not universally correspond to left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD). Gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion allows for the assessment of LVMD, yet its role in the CRT selection process remains debated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!