A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical usefulness of a prognostic score in histological analysis of renal biopsy in patients with lupus nephritis. | LitMetric

Clinical usefulness of a prognostic score in histological analysis of renal biopsy in patients with lupus nephritis.

J Rheumatol

Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Okayama City, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

Published: October 2009

Objective: To evaluate active and chronic lesions in association with renal outcome according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification in patients with lupus nephritis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 99 biopsy-proven subjects with lupus nephritis from 1990 to 2006 was performed in our center using the new classification. Each histological lesion was evaluated by multivariate survival analysis as predictive factor for renal insufficiency in patients with lupus nephritis, and independent predictors were graded to develop the prognostic score based on the regression coefficient. A receiver operating-characteristic curve based on the prognostic score was plotted to determine the most appropriate cutoff point.

Results: In class IV, the IV-G group tended to exhibit a worse renal outcome compared with the IV-S group, but the difference was not significant (log-rank test, p = 0.4330). Independent histological predictors of poor renal outcome were extracapillary proliferation, glomerular sclerosis, and fibrous crescents analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model, while predictors of favorable renal outcome were hyaline thrombi and fibrous adhesions. By the prognostic score, renal outcome was significantly worse in the group with the higher score (> or = 0.25) than in the group with the lower score (< 0.25) in class IV patients (log-rank test, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: These results demonstrate the advantage of our prognostic score compared to subclasses in predicting the renal outcome of class IV patients [University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) clinical trials registry, number UMIN 000001943].

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.080793DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal outcome
24
prognostic score
20
patients lupus
12
lupus nephritis
12
renal
8
log-rank test
8
score 025
8
class patients
8
score
7
outcome
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!