Study Objective: This randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluates the analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous single-dose paracetamol and morphine for the treatment of renal colic.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing single intravenous doses of paracetamol (1 g), morphine (0.1 mg/kg), and placebo (normal saline solution) for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected renal colic. Subjects with inadequate pain relief at 30 minutes received rescue fentanyl (0.75 microg/kg). We compared changes in pain intensity 30 minutes after treatment among the 3 arms, as well as the need for rescue medication and the presence of adverse effects.
Results: Six hundred forty-five consecutive patients were screened for study and 165 were entered. Eight subjects were subsequently excluded from analysis because of protocol violations and 11 were excluded because of uncertain diagnoses, leaving 146 subjects available for analysis. The mean reduction in visual analogue scale pain intensity scores at 30 minutes was 43 mm for paracetamol (95% confidence interval [CI] 35 to 51 mm), 40 mm for morphine (95% CI 29 to 52 mm), and 27 mm for placebo (95% CI 19 to 34 mm). Statistically significant mean differences in pain intensity reductions compared with those for placebo were observed for paracetamol (16; 95% CI 5 to 27; P=.005) and morphine (14; 95% CI 0.4 to 27; P=.05); however, no difference was found between paracetamol and morphine (2; 95% CI -13 to 16; P=.74). Rescue analgesics at 30 minutes were required by 21 subjects (45%) receiving paracetamol, 24 subjects (49%) receiving morphine, and 34 subjects (67%) receiving placebo (P=.08). At least 1 adverse effect was experienced by 11 (24%) receiving paracetamol, 16 (33%) receiving morphine, and 8 (16%) in the placebo group (P=.14). There were no serious adverse events.
Conclusion: Intravenous paracetamol is an efficacious and safe treatment for ED patients with renal colic.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.501 | DOI Listing |
Clin J Pain
January 2025
Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objectives: After cesarean, optimal analgesia is important for early mobilization, mitigating thromboembolic risks, and mother-infant communication. Our study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Methods: 82 patients were randomized into ESPB and ITM groups.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify analgesic use following alveolar cleft bone grafting (ABG) utilizing a posterior iliac crest (PIC) donor site.
Design: This is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients that underwent ABG with PIC in a 10 month period from November 2022 to September 2023.
Setting: Tertiary care free-standing pediatric hospital.
BMC Anesthesiol
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, 26426, Korea.
Background: Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPaediatr Anaesth
January 2025
Department of Anaesthesia, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Scand J Pain
January 2024
Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms Gata 35, 202 13 Malmö, Sweden.
Objectives: The efficacy of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in treating patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CnCP) is questionable, and the potential risks of adverse effects are well established. The aims were as follows: (1) compare characteristics in patients exposed to LTOT vs non-exposed. (2) Regarding opioid-exposed patients, describe characteristics of patients with risk factors for opioid use disorder or overdose in relation to opioid dosage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!