A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Nocturnal dipping is reproducible in the long term. | LitMetric

Nocturnal dipping is reproducible in the long term.

Blood Press Monit

Metabolic Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Published: October 2009

Objective: To examine the long-term reproducibility of nocturnal dipping as a dichotomous and continuous variable.

Methods: Retrospective review of an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) database of approximately 15 000 patients. Reproducibility of ABPM was assessed by repeatability coefficient. Kappa (kappa) statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to quantify dipping as a dichotomous and continuous variable, respectively.

Results: There were 512 never-treated patients with two ABPM assessments, a mean of 29 (+/-19) months apart. Blood pressure was 2/0 mmHg (awake) and 2/1 mmHg (asleep) higher on the second ABPM. The repeatability coefficient for awake systolic and awake diastolic pressure was 5.9 and 6.2%, respectively. When the dipper/non-dipper (dichotomous) classification was applied to both ABPMs, dipping status was unchanged in 76% of patients, kappa = 0.29. When nocturnal dip was expressed as a continuous variable, the mean nocturnal dip was 14% and the median absolute change between assessments was 3.8%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.60. The time interval between assessments was subdivided into (i) within 6 months, (ii) 6 months to 1 year, (iii) 1-2 years, (iv) 2-3 years and (v) more than 3 years. There was remarkable consistency independent of time interval for dipping expressed as a continuous variable but not as dipper/non-dipper.

Conclusion: These findings show that in the long term, nocturnal dip is more stable when expressed as a continuous variable. As recent evidence show cardiovascular risk to be inversely related to nocturnal blood pressure in a continuous manner, surely it makes more sense to express nocturnal dip in a similar way to aid stratification of overall cardiovascular risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832ff4e1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

continuous variable
16
nocturnal dip
16
blood pressure
12
expressed continuous
12
nocturnal dipping
8
long term
8
dipping dichotomous
8
dichotomous continuous
8
repeatability coefficient
8
intraclass correlation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!