Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.

Int J Prosthodont

Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Science, Unversity of California at San Francisco, California 94143-0758, USA.

Published: December 2009

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the retention of cast gold crowns cemented with different types of cements, comparing traditional and resin cements.
  • Forty-eight human molars were used and divided into six groups, with retention forces measured after 24 hours, revealing significant differences between the cements used.
  • Results showed that resin cement with a bonding agent had the highest retention forces, while traditional cements like zinc-phosphate exhibited the lowest, indicating resin cements may provide better long-term stability for dental crowns.

Article Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure in vitro retention of cast gold crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements. Forty-eight human molars were prepared on a lathe to produce complete crown preparations with a consistent taper and split into six groups, eight crowns in each group. Crowns were cast in a high-gold alloy and then cemented. After 24 hours, the retention force (N) was recorded and mean values were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and the Fisher post-hoc least significant difference (PLSD) multiple comparisons test (a = .05). Failure sites were examined under 3100 magnification and recorded. Mean values (SD) for each group in increasing order of retention force were: Harvard Cement: 43 N (27), TempoCem: 59 N (16), PermaCem Dual: 130 N (42), RelyX Luting Cement: 279 N (26), Contax and PermaCem Dual: 286 N (38), and TempoCem with Contax and PermaCem Dual: 340 N (14). The Fisher PLSD interval (P = .05) for comparing cements was 29 N. Zinc-phosphate cement and provisional resin cements had the lowest retention forces. Resin cement with a bonding agent and the hybrid-ionomer cement had similar retention forces. Resin cement with a bonding agent applied after use of a provisional resin cement had a significantly higher retention force than the other cements tested.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resin cements
12
retention force
12
permacem dual
12
resin cement
12
crowns cemented
8
cemented traditional
8
traditional resin
8
recorded values
8
contax permacem
8
provisional resin
8

Similar Publications

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTION OF A MODIFIED UNIVERSAL ADHESIVE: AN IN VITRO STUDY.

Georgian Med News

November 2024

2Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Background: Resin composites and dental adhesives are widely used to restore carious teeth. A relatively new category of the dental adhesives, the universal adhesives (UAs) is considered user friendly because of its simplicity to use and compatibility with any adhesive strategy. However, the adhesive interface created by these adhesives is highly susceptible to cracking after polymerization which in turn facilitates the initiation of secondary caries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Wear Resistance of Light-Cure Resin Luting Cements for Ceramic Veneers.

J Funct Biomater

December 2024

Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya 464-8651, Japan.

The purpose of this study was to compare the wear resistance of light-cure resin luting cements for veneers with that of other luting materials investigated in earlier studies. An Alabama wear-testing machine was used to measure the wear resistance of four recent light-cure resin luting cements for veneers (G-Cem Veneer; Panavia V5 LC; RelyX Veneer Cement; and Vario-link Esthetic LC). The volume loss ranged from 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study evaluated the effect of resin cements and post-space irrigation solutions on the push-out bond strength of diabetic and non-diabetic dentin. A total of 160 human central teeth (80 diabetic, 80 non-diabetic) were prepared using X5 files and obturated with AH Plus sealer and X5 gutta-percha. Post spaces were prepared, and teeth were divided into eight groups based on resin cements (Variolink N, Panavia SA Universal) and irrigation protocols (saline, saline + 2% CHX).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does the Type of Resin Luting Material Affect the Bonding of CAD/CAM Materials to Dentin?

Dent J (Basel)

January 2025

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, İstanbul 34728, Turkey.

This study aimed to investigate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of composite-based (Cerasmart), polymer-infiltrated (Vita Enamic), and feldspathic (Cerec) CAD/CAM blocks luted to dentin using a dual-cure resin cement (LinkForce), as well as micro-hybrid (G-aenial) and flowable composites (G-aenial Universal Flo), and evaluate the microhardness (HV) of luting materials through the CAD/CAM blocks. Cerasmart, Enamic, and Cerec were luted to dentin using three luting materials; LinkForce, G-aenial, and Universal Flo (n = 5). For HV, 117 disk-shaped specimens from LinkForce, G-aenial, and Universal Flo (n = 13) were polymerized through 3 mm thick CAD/CAM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Short dentin etching, a relatively recent technique, aims to improve resin-dentin bonding by preserving hydroxyapatite crystals within the collagen spaces. This study explores short dentin etching's potential in mitigating over-etching issues in deep proximal dentin/cementum margins, an aspect not previously investigated. This study evaluates the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and marginal adaptation of two universal adhesives using different etch-and-rinse strategies (15-second and 3-second etching) and self-etch strategies, both immediate and post-thermal cycling and mechanical loading.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!