A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Increased palpation tenderness and muscle strength deficit in the prediction of tendon hypertrophy in symptomatic unilateral shoulder tendinopathy: an ultrasonographic study. | LitMetric

Objective: In asymptomatic, normal tendons, the difference in tendon thickness between sides is less than 15%. In this study, three tests were used to examine differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders.

Design: Cross-sectional study. The three tests were performed in sequence. The observer was blinded in the maximal pain-free isometric force test.

Setting: Outpatient physiotherapy clinic at Bergen University College, Norway.

Participants: Sixty-four patients with an exclusive, tentative diagnosis of unilateral shoulder tendinopathy.

Main Outcome Measures: Differences in maximal pain-free isometric force, tendon pain pressure and tendon thickness measured by ultrasonography.

Results: This paper follows the STARD recommendations for papers on diagnostic accuracy. When cut-off values for within-subject side differences were selected at >or=0.8mm for tendon thickness (TT(diff)), >or=10N for maximal pain-free isometric force (PFF(diff)) and >or=0.6 kg for tendon pain pressure (PPT(diff)), positive tests were found in 92% of patients. All three tests were sensitive for the detection of within-subject side differences with the selected cut-off values (TT(diff), n=60/64; PPT(diff), n=59/64; PFF(diff), n=57/64; P>0.35). There were strong agreements between the three tests: TT(diff) and PFF(diff), 0.89; TT(diff) and PPT(diff), 0.83; and PFF(diff) and PPT(diff), 0.84. When both clinical tests were positive (PFF(diff) and PPT(diff)), the positive predictive value was excellent (94%) for finding increased tendon thickness in the symptomatic side on ultrasonography.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this partially blinded study, patients with unilateral shoulder tendinopathy exhibited significant differences between sides in all three tests. The combination of the two clinical tests seems to be valid for the detection of unilateral shoulder tendinopathy if other diagnoses have been excluded.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2008.09.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three tests
20
unilateral shoulder
16
tendon thickness
16
shoulder tendinopathy
12
maximal pain-free
12
pain-free isometric
12
isometric force
12
study three
8
tests
8
tendon pain
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!