Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Comparison of HPLC methods using conventional particle-based and monolithic columns for determination of indomethacin and its two degradation products, viz. 5-methoxy-2-methylindoleacetic acid and 4-chlorobenzoic acid, was carried out. Ketoprofen was used as an internal standard for data evaluation throughout the study. Conventional separation was based on analytical column Zorbax SB-Phenyl (75x4.6 mm; 3.5 microm particles) used with a mobile phase composition of acetonitrile and phosphoric acid 0.2% (50:50, v/v) and isocratic flow at 0.6 mL/min. Three different lengths of Chromolith columns RP-18e (25x4.6 mm, 50x4.6 mm, and 100x3 mm) were tested with respect to the validation parameters peak asymmetry, resolution, height equivalent to a theoretical plate, repeatability, and after optimisation compared to values obtained using a conventional Zorbax column. The developed methods were used to determine all three compounds in a pharmaceutical formulation--Indobene gel. Chromatographic parameters were comparable to those of a conventional particle-based column. The analysis time was shortened as expected (retention times were lowered by a factor of two). Moreover, the repeatability of peak areas and retention times obtained with a 50 mm monolithic column was greatly improved (RSD values were lower than 0.40%).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200900217 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!