Background: Results from clinical trials are generally not shared with participants unless they are thought to affect their future medical care. Few institutional review boards require that participants receive results of the research. Research in this area has largely focused on life-threatening medical conditions, and little is known about sharing clinical trial results in other populations. The purpose of this study was to determine the experience of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who had participated in a clinical trial and the best method for sharing clinical trial results.

Methods: The participants were adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis from a randomized clinical trial comparing 2 spinal implants. Patients, and their parents, were surveyed by mail before (May 2005) and after (January 2008) receiving the results of the study. The first survey focused on clinical trial experience, satisfaction with surgery, and eliciting the preferred method for receiving clinical trial results. The second survey examined patient and parent reactions to the trial results letter.

Results: Of 126 families who were mailed the pretrial results survey, 68% (86/126) of patients and 59% (74/126) of parents responded. Ninety-eight percent (84/86) of respondent patients and 96% (71/74) of respondent parents wanted to receive the results of the trial. Eighty-seven percent (75/86) of respondent patients and 86% (63/74) of respondent parents said the trial was a positive experience. Thirty-seven percent (32/86) of patients and 31% (23/74) of parents responded to the posttrial results survey, 25% (32/126) and 18% (23/126) of total trial participants, respectively. Sixty-three percent (20/32) of respondent patients and 70% (16/23) of respondent parents also felt that receiving the trial results by letter, with a telephone number for any questions, was the best way to receive the information. Seventy-two percent (23/32) of respondent patients and 70% (16/23) of respondent parents said they would participate in a future clinical trial.

Conclusions: Participating patients and parents want to know the results of research studies. Researchers should plan to inform patients by informing them of this option during the informed consent process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181aa2356DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical trial
28
respondent patients
16
respondent parents
16
sharing clinical
12
trial
12
idiopathic scoliosis
12
patients
11
adolescent idiopathic
8
clinical
8
parents
8

Similar Publications

Effects of double data extraction on errors in evidence synthesis: a crossover, multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Postgrad Med J

January 2025

Proof of Concept Center, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Medical University, No. 255, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Objectives: The objective was to investigate the role of double extraction in reducing data errors in evidence synthesis for pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Design: Crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Setting: University and hospital with teaching programs in evidence-based medicine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Therapeutic advancements for the polyglutamine diseases, particularly spinocerebellar degeneration, are eagerly awaited. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effects of L-arginine, which inhibits the conformational change and aggregation of polyglutamine proteins, in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6).

Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (clinical trial ID: AJA030-002, registration number: jRCT2031200135) was performed on 40 genetically confirmed SCA6 patients enrolled between September 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Our recent meta-analyses have demonstrated that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) causes a range of mean changes in various measures and predictors of endurance and sprint performance in athletes. Here, we extend the analyses to relationships between mean changes of these measures and consider implications for understanding and improving HIIT that were not apparent in the previous analyses.

Methods: The data were mean changes from HIIT with highly trained endurance and elite other (mainly team sport) athletes in studies where two or more measures or predictors of performance were available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Low density of electroencephalogram alpha band power was reported to be associated with perioperative cognitive dysfunction. Few studies have conducted to explore the effects of remimazolam on intraoperative frontal alpha band power spectrum density in older adults. Here, we aimed to explore the impact of remimazolam on intraoperative frontal brain wave alpha band activity and postoperative cognitive function in older adults undergoing lower extremity fractures surgeries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been determined as an established risk factor for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite the recommendation for in-hospital initiation of high-intensity statin therapy in AIS patients, achieving the desired target LDL-C levels remains challenging. Evolocumab, a highly effective and quickly acting agent for reducing LDL-C levels, has yet to undergo extensively exploration in the acute phase of AIS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!