Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5702_2 | DOI Listing |
Psychol Assess
March 2006
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75799, USA.
In this study, the authors examined the stability of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory--2 (J. N. Butcher, W.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Psychol
November 1997
Lees-Haley Psychological Corporation, CA, USA.
This study reports base rates of MMPI-2 clinical scales. PTSD scales, and validity scales for 492 personal injury plaintiffs, 230 men and 262 women. Scales studied included L, F, K, F minus K, Ds-r, Fake Bad, Ego Strength, Back F.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pers Assess
June 1996
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
We review issues that have arisen in exchanges with Dahlstrom and Humphrey (Dahlstrom & Humphrey, 1996; Humphrey & Dahlstrom, 1995) about assessing the comparability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and the MMPI. We point out the limitations of Q correlations (without contending that D(2) is "the only legitimate function of profile comparability," as Dahlstrom and Humphrey, 1996, p. 350, claim we do), and explain why Dahlstrom and Humphrey's (1996) new Q-correlational results, correctly interpreted, are consistent with our own previous observations and conclusions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Exp Neuropsychol
February 1995
Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Examined the comparability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) in a sample of brain-injured patients. There were 53 patients (36 males, 17 females; M age = 27.25, SD = 11.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pers Assess
December 1993
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
The introduction of the MMPI-2 has stimulated studies of its comparability with the MMPI. Graham, Timbrook, Ben-Porath, and Butcher (1991) consider the congruence between MMPI-2 and MMPI code types substantial, but Dahlstrom (1992) has questioned their appraisal, criticizing their use of "well-defined" code types. Our own analysis supports Graham and colleagues' (1991) conclusions and provides reasons for favoring narrow code types (such as well- defined code types) over nonrestrictive ones.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!