Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Hypothesis: Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstructions have the potential to convey the anatomy of proximal humeral fractures more realistically than do standard 2D images.
Material And Methods: Proximal humeral fractures in 248 adult patients were examined prospectively using 3D CT reconstructions. To our knowledge, this represents the largest reported series of such fractures examined by this method.
Results: Of 248 fractures examined by a 3D classification system, 14% were of the 2 Part type, 36% were 3 Part, 21% were Shield fractures, 13% were isolated tuberosity injuries, and 16% were fracture dislocations.
Conclusions: This study led to a modification of the Neer classification system. The frequency of each type of injury in this new classification is presented and a technique for viewing 3D images is suggested which maximizes their usefulness.
Level Of Evidence: Level 2; Clinical, observational, and prospective.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!