Background: Nipple-areolar reconstruction completes post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Many techniques for nipple reconstruction have been described, and each has their advocates and critics. One of the frequent failings of most designs is loss of nipple projection with time.
Objectives: To determine the effect of including autologous costal cartilage on patient satisfaction with their nipple reconstruction.
Methods: Sixty-eight patients were identified who had undergone fishtail flap nipple reconstruction following autologous free flap breast reconstruction between 1990 and 2004. Qualitative questionnaires, using Likert scales, were sent to each patient to specifically assess their satisfaction with their nipple reconstruction.
Results: Of 26 respondents (mean +/- SEM follow-up period 3.7+/-3.6 years), 13 had undergone nipple reconstruction incorporating costal cartilage banked at the time of initial breast reconstruction, and the other 13 had no cartilage in their nipple reconstructions. While both groups would opt for nipple reconstruction again, patients with cartilage grafts incorporated into their reconstructions had overall satisfaction ratings 1.92 grades higher on average (not significant, P=0.12) than those without. This difference increased to 3.2 grades when the satisfaction of the patient's partner was taken into account (P<0.05). Improved satisfaction corresponded to higher scores for volume, consistency, texture, and particularly for projection and contour of the nipple (P<0.05). Although nipple morphology changed over time, there was a trend toward improved stability in the cartilage group.
Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with nipple reconstruction can be improved by incorporating costal cartilage beneath the skin flaps. Superior contour and projection are sustained over time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2691559 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/229255030801600207 | DOI Listing |
Plast Surg (Oakv)
February 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Reconstructed breast with silicone breast implants (SBIs) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) provides high patient satisfaction from a cosmetic point of view, but low patient satisfaction with respect to hypoesthesia of the reconstructed breast, and reinnervation is required. Currently, few reports are available on reinnervation in breast reconstruction with implants, and detailed data on desensitization of reconstructed breasts are lacking. Therefore, we examined perceptual data after NSM with respect to reinnervation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Surg (Oakv)
February 2025
Plastic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Plast Reconstr Surg
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
The single port robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (SPrNSM) was recently introduced. This approach is safe and has led to favorable outcomes in relation to cosmetic result, patient satisfaction, and breast sensation. The typical reconstruction with all robotic nipple sparing mastectomies is implant based; however, this is not always what a patient desires.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAesthet Surg J
January 2025
Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Kliniken Duesseldorf GmBH, Graeulinger Strasse, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Background: Breasts with a broad base, constricted inframammary fold (IMF) and a short distance between the nipple and the IMF are predisposed to form a double bubble (DB) deformity. Most publications have focused on the correction of a DB rather than on its prevention and thorough analysis of the IMF.
Objectives: Introduction of a third dissection plane in breast augmentation for preventing or correcting DB deformities.
Plast Reconstr Surg
February 2025
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Understand the unique differences between mastopexy in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. (2) Describe the approach to performing mastopexy with autoaugmentation or after explantation. (3) Have insight into the approach and decision-making process for performing mastopexy with nipple-sparing mastectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!