A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effectiveness of dexmedetomidine infusion for sedating oral cancer patients undergoing awake fibreoptic nasal intubation. | LitMetric

Background And Objective: Dexmedetomidine is characterized with effects of sedation, analgesia, amnesia and lack of respiratory depression. Hence, it should be suitable for awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI).

Methods: We enrolled 30 oral cancer patients with limited mouth openings who were undergoing AFOI for elective surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups; the Dex group (n = 16) that received dexmedetomidine (1.0 microg kg(-1)) infusion and the Control group (n = 14) that received fentanyl (1.0 microg kg(-1)) infusion. Main outcomes were evaluated by grading scores presenting conditions for nasal intubation and postintubation. Other analysed parameters included airway obstruction, haemodynamic changes, consumption time for intubation, amnesia level and satisfaction.

Results: Intubation score (1-5) representing condition for nasal intubation was significantly better in the Dex group [2(1-3)] than in the Control group [3(2-5)] (P = 0.001). Postintubation score (1-3) representing tolerance to intubation also showed more favourable results in the Dex group [1(1-3)] than in the Control group [2(2-3)] (P = 0.002). The Dex group showed significantly reduced haemodynamic response to intubation than the Control group. Incidence requiring temporary haemodynamic support was higher in the Dex group but not of significance. Both levels of amnesia and satisfaction score were significant in the Dex group. Other analysed parameters such as consumption time for intubation, airway obstruction score and postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: Combination of dexmedetomidine loading with topical anaesthesia provides significant benefit for AFOI in intubation condition, patient tolerance, haemodynamic response, amnesia and satisfaction. Dexmedetomidine is effective for AFOI in anticipated difficult airway with only minor and temporary haemodynamic adverse effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832e0d2bDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dex group
24
control group
16
nasal intubation
12
intubation
10
group
10
oral cancer
8
cancer patients
8
awake fibreoptic
8
group received
8
microg kg-1
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!