A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of glenoid capsulolabral complex insertional anatomy and restoration with single- and double-row capsulolabral repairs. | LitMetric

Evaluation of glenoid capsulolabral complex insertional anatomy and restoration with single- and double-row capsulolabral repairs.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg

Center for Shoulder, Elbow and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Published: February 2010

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the normal glenoid insertional anatomy of the anterior-inferior capsulolabral complex and to compare the ability of a single-row repair and a double-row suture bridge repair to restore the insertional anatomy.

Methods: Eight fresh frozen cadaver shoulders were dissected and the native glenoid insertion of the anterior-inferior capsulolabral complex was digitized. Bankart lesions were created, the shoulders were randomized to receive either the standard single-row suture anchor repair or a double-row suture bridge repair, and the insertion repair sites were then digitized.

Results: The single-row repair recreated 42.3% of the native footprint surface area while the double-row repair recreated 85.9%. The double-row repair was significantly larger and recreated significantly more of the native footprint compared with single-row repair (P < .01).

Conclusion: Double-row repair of the capsulolabral complex reestablishes the native insertional footprint on the anterior inferior glenoid better than a single-row repair.

Level Of Evidence: Basic science study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

capsulolabral complex
16
single-row repair
12
double-row repair
12
repair
10
insertional anatomy
8
anterior-inferior capsulolabral
8
repair double-row
8
double-row suture
8
suture bridge
8
bridge repair
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!