Background: Photopheresis is an immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of T cell-mediated disorders. It has been used for rejection prophylaxis in cardiac transplantation, adjuvant treatment of bronchiolitis obliterans in lung transplantation, treatment of graft verse host disease, and in a small number of cases, for treatment of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Little is known of long-term outcomes following the use of photopheresis in solid organ transplantation.
Methods: We report prospective follow-up of our consecutive experience of the use of photopheresis as adjuvant/salvage therapy for problematic rejection in patients undergoing renal transplantation. Transplant graft survival, infective and malignant outcomes were reported.
Results: A cohort of 10 renal transplants recipients received photopheresis therapy for therapy-resistant rejection. Conventional therapy included an average of 6.2 g pulse methyl-prednisolone and 17.1 days antilymphocyte therapy. The cohort received additional photopheresis therapy when the unresponsive nature of their rejections raised concerns of graft loss. Median follow-up censored for patient loss was 66.7 months following photopheresis commencement. Rejection resolved in association with photopheresis use in all 10 patients. Six patients continued to have stable graft function (median serum creatinine: 191.5 micromol/L) at a median follow-up of 71.0 months. There has been one patient death from sepsis and two from malignancy with functioning grafts while one graft has been lost to disease recurrence.
Conclusion: Photopheresis may have a role as an adjuvant or salvage antirejection therapy in solid organ transplantation. Furthermore, evaluation in randomized controlled clinical trials is required to evaluate its potential.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jca.20199 | DOI Listing |
Transfusion
January 2025
Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) product characteristics are not well established. The aim of this study was to compare mononuclear cells (MNCs) collection using the new Amicus blue (AB) In-line ECP system to our standard Off-line ECP system using the Optia apheresis device and the MacoGenic G2 inactivation system (OM).
Study Design And Methods: We assessed the ECP products and procedure parameters, patient characteristics, and adverse events for both AB and OM systems in paired patients.
There are no good evidence-based recommendations for any systemic treatment of erosive lichen planus (ELP). Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may be an effective therapy for recalcitrant forms of the disease. We report 3 patients with severe ELP treated with ECP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Cancer
December 2024
Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address:
Blood Cell Ther
November 2024
Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Transfusion
January 2025
Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The inline system was developed by Therakos in 1987. Recently, Fresenius Kabi implemented an integration of cell separator Amicus and a UVA photoactivation device (Phelix), realizing an inline photopheresis system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!