Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We hypothesized that combination treatment with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine elicits better renoprotective effects than monotherapy with either drug, via different mechanisms in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) hypertensive rats. DS rats were fed a high-salt diet (4% NaCl) for 10 wk and were treated with vehicle (n = 12), eplerenone (50 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), p.o., n = 12), amlodipine (3 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), p.o., n = 12), or eplerenone plus amlodipine (n = 12) after 2 wk of salt feeding. Vehicle-treated DS rats developed proteinuria, which was attenuated by eplerenone or amlodipine. Interestingly, eplerenone attenuated the glomerulosclerosis and podocyte injury, but amlodipine did not. Conversely, treatment with amlodipine markedly improved interstitial fibrosis, while the effect of eplerenone was minimal. Combination treatment markedly improved proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, podocyte injury, and interstitial fibrosis in DS rats. Renal hypoxia estimated by pimonidazole, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and density of peritubular endothelial cells was exacerbated by salt feeding. Amlodipine, either as monotherapy or in combination, ameliorated the renal hypoxia, whereas eplerenone treatment had no effect. In conclusion, both eplerenone and amlodipine attenuated renal injuries in high salt-fed DS rats, but the targets for renoprotection differed between these two drugs, with eplerenone predominantly acting on glomeruli and amlodipine acting on interstitium. The combination of eplerenone and amlodipine improved renal injury more effectively than either monotherapy in high salt-fed DS rats, presumably by achieving their own renoprotective effects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00197.2009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!