A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of pupil dilation on repeatability of scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation in different stages of glaucoma. | LitMetric

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of pupil dilation on repeatability of scanning laser polarimetry with variable (GDx-VCC) and enhanced (GDx-ECC) corneal compensation, in different stages of glaucoma.

Methods: One eye of each of 37 Caucasian participants [14 healthy and ocular hypertensive subjects with mean deviation (MD) <2 dB, 11 glaucoma patients with MD 6 to 12 dB, and 12 glaucoma patients with MD >15 dB] was imaged 5 times with both GDx-VCC and GDx-ECC, before and after pupil dilation.

Results: No statistically significant alteration was found for any parameter or most coefficients of variation in any group, or in the total study population, due to pupil dilation. Intraclass correlation was similar with both compensation techniques: it varied between 98.5% and 99.2% before, and 97.3% and 99.1% after pupil dilation for all participants. Intrasession variability was below 6 mum for all parameters and all groups irrespective of corneal compensation and pupil dilation. By using GDx-ECC, a statistically significant trend for higher coefficient of variation values in more severe stages of glaucoma was found, irrespective of pupil dilation (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, P<0.026, for all parameters). With GDx-VCC this trend was not seen for 2 of the 3 parameters before pupil dilation, but did appear for all parameters in mydriasis (P<0.002).

Conclusions: Repeatability of GDx-VCC and GDx-ECC is similar, and is satisfactory for clinical purposes; it is only minimally influenced by pharmacological mydriasis. However, repeatability of the measurement decreases with increasing severity of glaucoma. This characteristic is better detectable with GDx-ECC than with GDx-VCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181a98f1cDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pupil dilation
24
corneal compensation
12
influence pupil
8
dilation repeatability
8
repeatability scanning
8
scanning laser
8
laser polarimetry
8
polarimetry variable
8
compensation stages
8
stages glaucoma
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!