Methods and management of the healthy brain study: a large multisite qualitative research project.

Gerontologist

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.

Published: June 2009

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Healthy Brain project involved collaboration among researchers from 9 universities, focusing on effective data management for a large qualitative study.
  • The study implemented protocols for data confidentiality, transcription accuracy, and qualitative training, ensuring proper handling of over 500 participant surveys and audiotapes.
  • Key results included the development of a comprehensive codebook through team coding strategies and high interrater agreement, highlighting the importance of clear communication and structured training in managing complex research projects.

Article Abstract

Purpose Of The Study: To describe processes used in the Healthy Brain project to manage data collection, coding, and data distribution in a large qualitative project, conducted by researchers at 9 universities in 9 states.

Design And Methods: Project management protocols included: (a) managing audiotapes and surveys to ensure data confidentiality, data tracking and distribution; (b) managing qualitative data to ensure the accuracy and confidentiality of transcription; (c) training in qualitative methods and use of qualitative software; and (d) managing participant survey data and analysis.

Results: The project team coded and managed qualitative and survey data for 69 focus groups with more than 500 participants. Multiple interactive training sessions in qualitative data analysis and use of qualitative software (ATLAS.ti) were conducted. To develop a codebook, 2 teams used an open-coding process to identify codes and develop definitions; 2 team members integrated and conceptually organized these results into an initial codebook. For the audio-recordings from each research site, 2 or 3 team members hand coded 1 transcript and calculated interrater agreement (.80 or higher).

Implications: Using clear protocols, participatory training sessions, team-based coding, and frequent communication among team members via e-mail and regular in-person meetings promotes effective management of large-scale qualitative research projects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp076DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

team members
12
qualitative
9
healthy brain
8
qualitative project
8
data
8
qualitative data
8
qualitative software
8
survey data
8
training sessions
8
project
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!