Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The objective of this study was to explore the influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure by urodynamic study. 41 patients (with unilateral renal and/or ureteral calculi) after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) were placed a 4.7-Fr ureteral stent and 16-Fr nephrostomy tube. Renal pelvic pressure of these patients was measured by urodynamic study at the 5-7 days after MPCNL. Renal pelvic pressure (RPP), intraabdominal pressure (IAP), and vesical pressure (VP) during the filling and voiding phases were detected by urodynamic study with intravesical perfusion. At the baseline, intraabdominal pressure (IAP(0)) was 27.52 +/- 7.03 cmH(2)O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP(0)) was 33.07 +/- 7.04 cmH(2)O; at the maximum cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) during the filling phase, vesical pressure (VP(vol)) was 41.61 +/- 10.34 cmH(2)O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP(vol)) was 39.44 +/- 7.33 cmH(2)O; at the maximum vesical pressure during the voiding phase, vesical pressure (VP(max)) was 74.95 +/- 12.79 cmH(2)O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP(max)) was 65.68 +/- 17.03 cmH(2)O. (1) There was a strong relationship between RPP(0) and IAP(0) (P = 0.0001); (2) There was statistical significance among RPP(0), RPP(vol) and RPP(max) (P = 0.0001); (3) RPP was higher than 40 cmH(2)O during the voiding phase, and it was obviously relevant to the VP (P = 0.0001) but not to the MCBC (P = 0.2696). RPP increased mildly during the filling phase and dramatically during the voiding phase after stenting. RPP increased higher than the level required for a backflow (40 cmH(2)O) during the voiding phase. So it was encouraged to remove the stent at earlier stage or decrease using the ureteral stent if possible.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0199-z | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!