Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence--a study of structural response in protein cores.

Proteins

Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Published: November 2009

AI Article Synopsis

  • Protein structures evolve over time due to mutations, and this study specifically examines how core components of protein structures relate to their sequences.
  • On average, protein cores evolve in a linear manner with the evolutionary distance, showing that structural changes occur three to ten times slower than sequence changes.
  • While most proteins exhibit a consistent linear response to evolution, there is significant variance among different domain families, with beta-sheets changing faster than alpha-helices due to their shorter length and change occurring at the ends.

Article Abstract

Protein structures change during evolution in response to mutations. Here, we analyze the mapping between sequence and structure in a set of structurally aligned protein domains. To avoid artifacts, we restricted our attention only to the core components of these structures. We found that on average, using different measures of structural change, protein cores evolve linearly with evolutionary distance (amino acid substitutions per site). This is true irrespective of which measure of structural change we used, whether RMSD or discrete structural descriptors for secondary structure, accessibility, or contacts. This linear response allows us to quantify the claim that structure is more conserved than sequence. Using structural alphabets of similar cardinality to the sequence alphabet, structural cores evolve three to ten times slower than sequences. Although we observed an average linear response, we found a wide variance. Different domain families varied fivefold in structural response to evolution. An attempt to categorically analyze this variance among subgroups by structural and functional category revealed only one statistically significant trend. This trend can be explained by the fact that beta-sheets change faster than alpha-helices, most likely due to that they are shorter and that change occurs at the ends of the secondary structure elements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.22458DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three ten
8
ten times
8
structural
8
structural response
8
protein cores
8
structural change
8
cores evolve
8
secondary structure
8
linear response
8
structure
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!