Why become more general when we can be more specific? Comment on Hollins et al. "Perceived intensity and unpleasantness of cutaneous and auditory stimuli: an evaluation of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis" [Pain 2009;141:215-221], and on Rollman "Perspectives on hypervigilance" [Pain 2009;141:183-184].

Stefaan Van Damme Geert Crombez Katja Wiech Valéry Legrain Madelon L Peters Christopher Eccleston

Pain

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK READ - Unité de Réadaptation et de Médecine physique, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve & Brussels, Belgium Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands Centre for Pain Research, School for Health, University of Bath, UK.

Published: August 2009

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.04.035	DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general specific?

specific? comment

comment hollins

hollins "perceived

"perceived intensity

intensity unpleasantness

unpleasantness cutaneous

cutaneous auditory

auditory stimuli

stimuli evaluation

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!

Download full-text PDF

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?