Background: Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) is a prominent cause of diarrhoea, and is characterised in part by its carriage of a pathogenicity island: the locus for enterocyte effacement (LEE). EPEC is divided into two subtypes according to the presence of bundle-forming pili (BFP), a fimbrial adhesin that is a virulence determinant of typical EPEC (tEPEC), but is absent from atypical EPEC (aEPEC). Because aEPEC lack BFP, their virulence has been questioned, as they may represent LEE-positive Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) that have lost the toxin-encoding prophage, or tEPEC that have lost the genes for BFP. To determine if aEPEC isolated from humans in Australia or New Zealand fall into either of these categories, we undertook phylogenetic analysis of 75 aEPEC strains, and compared them with reference strains of EPEC and STEC. We also used PCR and DNA hybridisation to determine if aEPEC carry virulence determinants that could compensate for their lack of BFP.

Results: The results showed that aEPEC are highly heterogeneous. Multilocus sequence typing revealed that 61 of 75 aEPEC strains did not belong to known tEPEC or STEC clades, and of those that did, none expressed an O:H serotype that is frequent in tEPEC or STEC strains associated with disease. PCR for each of 18 known virulence-associated determinants of E. coli was positive in less than 15% of strains, apart from NleB which was detected in 30%. Type I fimbriae were expressed by all aEPEC strains, and 12 strains hybridised with DNA probes prepared from either bfpA or bfpB despite being negative in the PCR for bfpA.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that clinical isolates of aEPEC obtained from patients in Australia or New Zealand are not derived from tEPEC or STEC, and suggest that functional equivalents of BFP and possibly type I fimbriae may contribute to the virulence of some aEPEC strains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2700815PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-117DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aepec strains
16
tepec stec
12
aepec
10
strains
9
enteropathogenic coli
8
determine aepec
8
australia zealand
8
type fimbriae
8
epec
5
tepec
5

Similar Publications

Identification of a genomic cluster related to hypersecretion of intestinal mucus and mucinolytic activity of atypical enteropathogenic (aEPEC).

Front Cell Infect Microbiol

December 2024

Laboratório Experimental de Patogenicidade de Enterobactérias, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Enteropathogenic (EPEC) strains are subdivided into typical (tEPEC) and atypical (aEPEC) according to the presence or absence of a virulence-associated plasmid called pEAF. Our research group has previously demonstrated that two aEPEC strains, 0421-1 and 3991-1, induce an increase in mucus production in a rabbit ileal loop model . This phenomenon was not observed with a tEPEC prototype strain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rats are rodents commonly found in Thailand that carry various zoonotic pathogens. Bacterial zoonosis can occur in a shared environment between humans and rats, especially in human communities and agricultural areas. , particularly pathogenic and multidrug-resistant strains, is a significant public health concern that is transmitted by rats.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intestinal Carriage of Two Distinct -Carrying Strains by a Child with Uncomplicated Diarrhea.

Pathogens

November 2024

Department Clinical Biology, Laboratory of Microbiology and Infection Control, Belgian National Reference Centre for STEC/VTEC, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Two distinct -carrying () strains, isolated from a child with uncomplicated diarrhea fifteen weeks apart, were characterized by combining short- and long-read sequencing to compare their genetic relatedness. One strain was characterized as Shiga toxin-producing (STEC)/typical enteropathogenic (tEPEC) O63:H6 with a repertoire of virulence genes including , (α2-subtype), , and . The other STEC with serotype O157:H16, reported for the first time as -carrying in this study, possessed, in addition, (ε-subtype) and , amongst other virulence-related genes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phenotypic diversity of type III secretion system activity in enteropathogenic clinical isolates.

J Med Microbiol

October 2024

Departamento de Microbiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mor., Mexico.

Enteropathogenic (EPEC) strains pose a significant threat as a leading cause of severe childhood diarrhoea in developing nations. EPEC pathogenicity relies on the type III secretion system (T3SS) encoded by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), facilitating the secretion and translocation of bacterial effector proteins. While the regulatory roles of PerC (plasmid-encoded regulator) and GrlA (global regulator of LEE-activator) in expression and LEE gene activation are well-documented in the EPEC prototype strain E2348/69, understanding the variability in LEE gene expression control mechanisms among clinical EPEC isolates remains an area requiring further investigation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Expression of the locus of enterocyte effacement genes during the invasion process of the atypical enteropathogenic 1711-4 strain of serotype O51:H40.

Microbiol Spectr

October 2024

Disciplina de Microbiologia, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Article Synopsis
  • - Atypical enteropathogenic (aEPEC) is a big cause of diarrhea in poorer countries, and one specific strain called aEPEC 1711-4 can invade gut cells and even spread to other parts of the body in tests with rats.
  • - Scientists studied how this strain interacts with cells in the intestines and found that it has special genes that help it stick and invade, but they still don’t totally understand how these processes work.
  • - The research shows that although the strain can move into cells and stay there, more work is needed to figure out exactly how it does this and what makes it different from other bacteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!