383 Thai soldiers on the Thai-Cambodian border were entered into a randomized malaria chemoprophylactic trial. Proguanil (200 mg/day) combined with sulfamethoxazole (1000 or 1500 mg/day) were compared to a standard combination of weekly pyrimethamine/dapsone (Maloprim). Men receiving proguanil/sulfamethoxazole had a significantly lower malaria attack rate than those taking pyrimethamine/dapsone. This was true of both the first five-week phase in which 1000 mg of sulfamethoxazole was used (0.11 vs 0.26; p less than 0.001) and in the second ten weeks in which 1500 mg of sulfamethoxazole was used (0.13 vs 0.30; p less than 0.001). Combined relative efficacy indicated that proguanil/sulfamethoxazole was better than pyrimethamine/dapsone by 64% for Plasmodium vivax and by 38% for P. falciparum. Unenforced compliance as measured by returned pills was greater than 86% in both groups. No serious drug side-effects were observed. Proguanil/sulfamethoxazole may represent a useful chemoprophylactic option in areas of multiple drug-resistant malaria.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thai-cambodian border
8
proguanil/sulfamethoxazole
4
proguanil/sulfamethoxazole malaria
4
malaria chemoprophy-laxis
4
chemoprophy-laxis thai-cambodian
4
border 383
4
383 thai
4
thai soldiers
4
soldiers thai-cambodian
4
border entered
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!