Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the shaping ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, BioRaCe, and BioRaCe + S-Apex instruments in simulated canals with an S-shaped curvature.

Methods: Canal transportation and aberrations were assessed by comparing the preinstrumentation and postinstrumentation images under a stereomicroscope. Analysis of variance and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: ProTaper instruments caused more pronounced canal transportation in the apical curvature (P < .01) than all other instruments. The use of ProTaper, Mtwo, and BioRaCe instruments resulted in more canal aberrations compared with BioRaCe + S-Apex (P < .05).

Conclusions: NiTi systems including less tapered and more flexible instruments like S-Apex seem to be favorable when preparing S-shaped canals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shaping ability
8
instruments simulated
8
s-shaped canals
8
protaper mtwo
8
mtwo biorace
8
biorace s-apex
8
canal transportation
8
instruments
6
ability nickel-titanium
4
nickel-titanium rotary
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!