Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a case-control study.

World J Gastroenterol

Cancer Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Published: May 2009

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to identify factors that hinder colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in an urban Chinese community population.
  • The research involved a case-control design where participants were grouped based on their participation in CRC screening tests, highlighting differences in willingness to undergo screening related to occupation and gender.
  • Key barriers included poor awareness of CRC, fear of the screening process, time constraints, and costs, suggesting that improving public knowledge and making screening more accessible could enhance participation rates.

Article Abstract

Aim: To investigate barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a community population.

Methods: We conducted a community-based case-control study in an urban Chinese population by questionnaire. Cases were selected from those completing both a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) case and colonoscopy in a CRC screening program in 2004. Control groups were matched by gender, age group and community. Control 1 included those having a positive FOBT but refusing a colonoscopy. Control 2 included those who refused both an FOBT and colonoscopy.

Results: The impact of occupation on willingness to attend a colorectal screening program differed by gender. P for heterogeneity was 0.009 for case vs control group 1, 0.01 for case versus control group 2, and 0.80 for control group 1 vs 2. Poor awareness of CRC and its screening program, characteristics of screening tests, and lack of time affected the screening rate. Financial support, fear of pain and bowel preparation were barriers to a colonoscopy as a screening test. Eighty-two percent of control group 1 and 87.1% of control group 2 were willing attend if the colonoscopy was free, but only 56.3% and 53.1%, respectively, if it was self-paid. Multivariate odds ratios for case vs control group 1 were 0.10 among those unwilling to attend a free colonoscopy and 0.50 among those unwilling to attend a self-paid colonoscopy.

Conclusion: Raising the public awareness of CRC and its screening, integrating CRC screening into the health care system, and using a painless colonoscopy would increase its screening rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686913PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2531DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control group
24
crc screening
20
screening program
12
screening
11
control
9
barriers colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
case-control study
8
control included
8
case control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!