The SO bridge of the complex, [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-SBn)(mu-SO)], 1, displayed nucleophilicity at O, giving alkylation products [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-SBn)(mu-SOR)](+), 4(+), which contained the thioperoxide bridge. These cations were then subject to nucleophilic attack by two pathways. Debenzylation of the bridge thiolate in 4(+) afforded neutral [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-S)(mu-SOR)], 5; de-esterification of a dithiophosphate ligand in 4(+) gave [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(O)(OEt))(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-SBn)(mu-SO)], 6, which contained a monoester, dithiophosphate ligand. Complex 1 gave a slow and clean reaction in the crystalline state, further demonstrating its nucleophilicity by attacking a neighboring molecule in its lattice. X-ray crystallography confirmed the thioperoxide linkage and revealed structural similarities of the Mo(2)(mu-SOR) unit to sulfenate esters (RSOR) and related derivatives.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic9002093 | DOI Listing |
J Phys Chem A
April 2015
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
The conformations, equilibrium structures, hydrogen bonds, and non-covalent interactions involved in the mechanisms of tautomerization, condensations, and C-sulfenylation and O-sulfenylation of 2,4-pentanedione by sulfur hydride hydroxide (hydrogen thioperoxide, oxadisulfane, H-SOH) have been studied using BD(T), CCSD(T), and QCISD(T) with the cc-pVTZ basis set and using B3LYP, B3PW91, CAM-B3LYP, PBE1PBE, PBEh1PBE, LC-ωPBE, M06-2X, and ωB97XD with the 6-311+G(d,p) basis set. All levels of theory predict the sulfenyl (H-SOH) tautomer of hydrogen thioperoxide to be lower in energy than the sulfinyl (H2S═O) tautomer. Four reasonable mechanisms were considered for the tautomerization of the sulfenyl tautomer of hydrogen thioperoxide to the sulfinyl tautomer: a cyclic three-membered water-free transition state (TS, CCSD(T) activation energy barrier E(⧧) = 65.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInorg Chem
June 2009
Department of Chemistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA.
The SO bridge of the complex, [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-SBn)(mu-SO)], 1, displayed nucleophilicity at O, giving alkylation products [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-SBn)(mu-SOR)](+), 4(+), which contained the thioperoxide bridge. These cations were then subject to nucleophilic attack by two pathways. Debenzylation of the bridge thiolate in 4(+) afforded neutral [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-S)(mu-SOR)], 5; de-esterification of a dithiophosphate ligand in 4(+) gave [Mo(2)(NTo)(2)(S(2)P(O)(OEt))(S(2)P(OEt)(2))(mu-O(2)CMe)(mu-SBn)(mu-SO)], 6, which contained a monoester, dithiophosphate ligand.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!