Background: Mandatory postoperative food intake has been shown to increase nausea and vomiting, and so postoperative fasting has become common practice even if patients request food or drink.
Objective: We sought to investigate whether postoperative fasting reduces the incidence of postoperative vomiting in children when compared with a liberal regimen in which they are allowed to eat and drink upon request.
Methods: One hundred forty-seven children scheduled for outpatient surgery were randomized to one of two groups. After anesthesia, patients in the 'fasting' group were expected to fast for 6 h. The children in the 'liberal' group were allowed to eat and drink according to their own needs. The incidence of vomiting and the children's well-being were recorded at several time points over a 24-hour period. Parents were also asked to rate, on a scale of 0-6, how much their children were bothered by fasting, pain, and nausea/vomiting.
Results: Age (4.8 +/- 2.6 years), weight (20 +/- 9 kg) and gender (73% boys) were comparable between the groups. The incidence of vomiting was 15% in the liberal and 22% in the fasting group (P = 0.39) and, between 1 and 12 h after extubation, children in the liberal group were significantly happier (P < 0.001). Children in the liberal group were significantly less bothered by their pain than those in the fasting group (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Postoperative fasting did not reduce the incidence of vomiting after general anesthesia in children when compared with a liberal regimen. Furthermore, the ability to eat and drink at will decrease the bothersome aspects of pain and lead to happier patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02974.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!