A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The compensatory responses to upper airway obstruction in normal subjects under propofol anesthesia. | LitMetric

The compensatory responses to upper airway obstruction in normal subjects under propofol anesthesia.

Respir Physiol Neurobiol

Nagasaki University of Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Division of Clinical Physiology, Nagasaki, Japan.

Published: March 2009

Upper airway obstruction during sleep can trigger compensatory neuromuscular responses and/or prolong inspiration in order to maintain adequate minute ventilation. The aim of this study was to investigate the strength of these compensatory responses during upper airway obstruction during propofol anesthesia. We assessed respiratory timing and upper airway responses to decreases in nasal pressure in nine propofol anesthetized normal subjects under condition of decreased (passive) and increased (active) neuromuscular activity. Critical closing pressure (PCRIT) and upstream resistance (RUS) were derived from pressure-flow relationships generated from each condition. The inspiratory duty cycle (IDC), maximum inspiratory flow (V1max) and respiratory rate (f) were determined at two levels of mean inspiratory airflow (VI; mild airflow limitation with VI > or = 150 ml s-1; severe airflow limitation with VI < 150 ml s-1). Compared to the passive condition, PCRIT decreased significantly (5.3 +/- 3.8 cm H2O, p < 0.05) and RUS increased (7.4 cm H2O ml-1 s, p < 0.05) in the active condition. The IDC increased progressively and comparably as decreased in both the passive and active conditions (p < 0.05). These findings imply that distinct compensatory mechanisms govern the modulation of respiratory pattern and pharyngeal patency during periods of airway obstruction under propofol anesthesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754397PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2009.01.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper airway
16
airway obstruction
16
propofol anesthesia
12
compensatory responses
8
responses upper
8
normal subjects
8
obstruction propofol
8
decreased passive
8
airflow limitation
8
limitation 150
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!