A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Selective reduction of central pulse pressure under angiotensin blockage in SHR: role of the fibronectin-alpha5beta1 integrin complex. | LitMetric

Background: Meta-analyses of antihypertensive therapy suggest that, independently of blood pressure (BP) level, stroke prevention is influenced mainly by calcium-entry blockers (CEB) and cardiac risk prevention by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). The possibility that central systolic and pulse pressure (PP) reduction differs between the two drug classes for the same mean BP (MBP) has never been explored. Our aim was to compare carotid PP at the same MBP obtained with the CEB, amlodipine, and the ACEI, trandolapril, in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and to evaluate the resulting changes of fibronectin (Fn) and its integrin alpha5beta1 receptor on central PP and arterial stiffness.

Methods: Amlodipine and trandolapril were administered chronically to achieve the same MBP. Carotid arterial systolic BP (SBP) and PP, diameter and incremental elastic modulus (E(inc)) were determined using echo Doppler techniques, and complemented with vascular histomorphometry, and Fn and alpha5beta1-integrin immunolabeling.

Results: Both drugs produced the same MBP, carotid wall thickness, and stress. Trandolapril reduced PP and E(inc) significantly more than amlodipine, while both agents comparably lowered EIIIA-Fn. Total Fn and alpha-subunit were lowered significantly by trandolapril, but unaffected by amlodipine, indicating that ACEI alone contributed to both diminished carotid stiffness and decrease of the Fn-integrin complex.

Conclusions: Results showed that amlodipine and trandolapril have different effects on carotid mechanical properties for comparable MBP reduction. Changes in Fn-integrin complex not only modify consistently ACEI mechanotransduction but also are associated with selective central PP reduction. Whether this property has consequences on cardiovascular (CV) risk remains to be investigated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2009.87DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulse pressure
8
amlodipine trandolapril
8
mbp carotid
8
mbp
5
carotid
5
amlodipine
5
trandolapril
5
selective reduction
4
central
4
reduction central
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!