The medical-legal problem of occult traumatic optic neuropathy diagnosed in patients who actually have feigned visual loss (malingering) is reviewed along with guidelines for suspecting and differentiating feigned visual loss from true traumatic optic neuropathy. We explain why we feel the term occult optic neuropathy is inappropriate and misleading, and the medical-legal consequences of this misdiagnosis are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.02.006 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!