A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cortical activity prior to predictable postural instability: is there a difference between self-initiated and externally-initiated perturbations? | LitMetric

Previous work has revealed pre-perturbation cortical activity linked to predictably-timed perturbations to upright stability. Because individuals rely on the ability to anticipate perturbations for independent mobility, we sought to determine whether perturbation-evoked cortical potentials elicited by voluntarily-initiated external perturbations were dissociable from those elicited by externally-cued perturbations. Postural instability was evoked under three experimental conditions: cued external perturbations (EXT-CUE), cued self-initiated perturbations (SELF-CUE), and un-cued self-initiated perturbations (SELF-NO CUE). All conditions were characterized by comparable pre-perturbation slow-wave potentials initiated 1536.83+/-44.94 ms prior to perturbation onset, measuring 11.24+/-0.94 microV in amplitude. There were no differences in pre-perturbation cortical activity across tasks. Post-perturbation N1 potentials were also evoked, reaching peak amplitude at 132.63+/-3.40 ms following perturbation onset. The potentials were significantly larger in the EXT-CUE (17.08+/-2.99 microV) condition than both the SELF-CUE (11.98+/-2.53 microV) and SELF-NO CUE conditions (9.24+/-1.79 microV). There were no significant differences across tasks for measures of tibialis anterior muscle activity prior to or following perturbation onset, nor were there significant differences in centre of pressure excursion amplitude across tasks. This study highlights that despite using different mechanisms to initiate temporally predictable perturbations to upright stability, pre-perturbation cortical events with similar spatio-temporal characteristics and magnitude are evoked, signalling consistency in the cortical processes that optimize compensatory postural responses which are independent from the cues that inform the onset of postural instability. These findings enhance the understanding of cortical involvement in postural control.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cortical activity
12
postural instability
12
pre-perturbation cortical
12
perturbation onset
12
activity prior
8
perturbations
8
perturbations upright
8
upright stability
8
external perturbations
8
self-initiated perturbations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!