Purpose: To compare core muscle activity during resistance exercises performed on stable ground vs. the BOSU Balance Trainer.
Methods: Twelve trained men performed the back squat, dead lift, overhead press, and curl lifts. The activity of the rectus abdominis, external oblique abdominis, transversus abdominis/internal oblique abdominis, and erector spinae muscles was assessed. Subjects performed each lift under three separate conditions including standing on stable ground with 50% of a 1-RM, standing on a BOSU Balance Trainer with 50% of a 1-RM, and standing on stable ground with 75% of a 1-RM.
Results: Significant differences were noted between the stable 75% of 1-RM and BOSU 50% of 1-RM conditions for the rectus abdominis during the overhead press and transversus abdominis/internal oblique abdominis during the overhead press and curl (P < .05). Conversely, there were no significant differences between the stable 75% of 1-RM and BOSU 50% of 1-RM conditions for the external obliques and erector spinae across all lifts examined. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the BOSU 50% of 1-RM and stable 50% of 1-RM conditions across all muscles and lifts examined.
Conclusions: The current study did not demonstrate any advantage in utilizing the BOSU Balance Trainer. Therefore, fitness trainers should be advised that each of the aforementioned lifts can be performed while standing on stable ground without losing the potential core muscle training benefits.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.4.1.97 | DOI Listing |
J Sports Med Phys Fitness
November 2024
Institute for Research in Medicine and Epidemiology of Sport, INSEP, Paris, France -
Lung Cancer
December 2024
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands. Electronic address:
Front Sports Act Living
October 2024
Translational Physiology Laboratory, São Judas Tadeu University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Introduction: Strength training (ST) is a strategy to enhance quality of life through increased strength, muscle hypertrophy, and functional capacity. Training systems are associated with manipulation of volume and intensity, generating different stimuli, such as Rest-Pause (RP) and Sarcoplasmic Stimulating Training (SST). These systems induce greater mechanical and physiological stress, leading to increased strength and muscle hypertrophy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNutrients
October 2024
Sport Sciences Research Centre, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Spain.
Background: Numerous meta-analyses have assessed the efficacy of creatine supplementation in increasing muscle strength. However, most have not considered the effect of the participants' age, training duration, or other confounding variables on strength outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to consider the effect of these variables on the potential efficacy of creatine supplementation and resistance training for improving measures of muscle strength.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Physiol
August 2024
School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Background: High-intensity resistance training is known to be the most effective method for enhancing muscle strength and thickness, but it carries potential injury risks. Blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with resistance training has been proposed as a safer alternative method for improving muscle strength and thickness.
Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted, including 20 studies from five databases that met the inclusion criteria, to assess the efficacy of BFR combined with resistance training compared to traditional resistance training (NOBFR).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!