AI Article Synopsis

  • T cells are crucial for fighting infections but can be improperly activated, leading to various diseases, so understanding their signaling pathways is important for developing new treatments.
  • Research compared two human T cell lines (Jurkat E6.1 and HuT78) with activated peripheral blood T cells (APBTs) using biochemical techniques, revealing that HuT78 closely resembles APBTs in certain signaling aspects, while Jurkat E6.1 showed increased activity linked to Itk overexpression.
  • The study concludes that while both T cell lines have unique similarities and differences to primary T cells, researchers need to weigh their advantages and disadvantages when selecting a model for experimentation.

Article Abstract

Background: Human T cells play an important role in pathogen clearance, but their aberrant activation is also linked to numerous diseases. T cells are activated by the concurrent induction of the T cell receptor (TCR) and one or more costimulatory receptors. The characterization of signaling pathways induced by TCR and/or costimulatory receptor activation is critical, since these pathways are excellent targets for novel therapies for human disease. Although studies using human T cell lines have provided substantial insight into these signaling pathways, no comprehensive, direct comparison of these cell lines to activated peripheral blood T cells (APBTs) has been performed to validate their usefulness as a model of primary T cells.

Methodology/principal Findings: We used quantitative biochemical techniques to compare the activation of two widely used human T cell lines, Jurkat E6.1 and HuT78 T cells, to APBTs. We found that HuT78 cells were similar to APBTs in proximal TCR-mediated signaling events. In contrast, Jurkat E6.1 cells had significantly increased site-specific phosphorylation of Pyk2, PLCgamma1, Vav1, and Erk1/Erk2 and substantially more Ca2+ flux compared to HuT78 cells and APBTs. In part, these effects appear to be due to an overexpression of Itk in Jurkat E6.1 cells compared to HuT78 cells and APBTs. Both cell lines differ from APBTs in the expression and function of costimulatory receptors and in the range of cytokines and chemokines released upon TCR and costimulatory receptor activation.

Conclusions/significance: Both Jurkat E6.1 and HuT78 T cells had distinct similarities and differences compared to APBTs. Both cell lines have advantages and disadvantages, which must be taken into account when choosing them as a model T cell line.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2673025PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005430PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cell lines
20
cells apbts
20
hut78 cells
20
jurkat e61
16
cells
11
comparison cell
8
tcr costimulatory
8
costimulatory receptors
8
signaling pathways
8
costimulatory receptor
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!