AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare clinical and imaging results of cervical spine surgery using either bioresorbable or titanium plates in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
  • 40 patients were randomly assigned to receive either type of plate, with follow-ups assessing pain relief and bone density through various imaging techniques.
  • Results showed no significant differences in segmental motion, fusion rates, or pain levels between the two groups, suggesting bioresorbable plates are a viable alternative to titanium.

Article Abstract

Study Design: This is a prospective, randomized, and controlled study, approved by the local ethical committee of Saarland (Germany), no. 209/06.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare clinical results, segmental motility, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility, and change of the bone density of a cervical spine segment that was treated with either bioresorbable or titanium plates in single level.

Summary And Background Data: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion including plate fixation is an accepted technique for treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Titanium plates have been used but cause imaging artifacts. Radiolucent bioresorbable plates and screws were developed to reduce the imaging artifacts associated with titanium.

Methods: Forty patients with single level cervical radiculopathy were randomized to anterior discectomy and fusion with bioresorbable plate (19 patients, study group) or titanium plate (18 patients, control group). Follow-up used a visual analog scale (VAS) with regard to brachial pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) for neck pain. Radiostereometry was performed immediately postoperative and after 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months. MRI of the cervical spine was obtained immediately postoperatively at 3 and 6 months to assess hematoma, infection, and swelling. Computed tomography of the operated cervical spine segment was performed to assess bone density, expressed in Hounsfield units.

Results: Three-dimensional analysis of segmental motion (medio-lateral, cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior) did not reveal any statistical difference between both groups at any time postoperatively (P>0.05). Fusion rate and speed evaluated on Radiostereometric analysis and computed tomography of cervical spine segment were similar in both groups. MRI of cervical spine did not show any pathology, especially hematoma and infection. The VAS and NDI did not differ between both groups after 6 months (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Anterior plate fixation by using a bioresorbable plate has the same fusion progress and stability as titanium. During the study, no complications like soft tissue swelling and infection occurred.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181761934DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical spine
20
titanium plates
12
spine segment
12
bioresorbable titanium
8
cervical
8
bone density
8
discectomy fusion
8
plate fixation
8
imaging artifacts
8
bioresorbable plate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!