Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To determine the interest and simplicity of 3D ultrasound for the 3-month check in place of the recommended routine radiologic in a general gynecology practice.
Patients And Method: Twenty-five patients had routine radiologic and transvaginal 3D ultrasound (Voluson 730 Expert) 3 months after placement of Essure micro-insert.
Results: Twenty-one 3D acquisitions were realized. In all cases, the micro-insert are easily visualized. Ideally, the echogenic micro-insert appears in the cornuale portion of the fallopian tube. The relationship between the micro insert and the uterine cavity is well documented.
Conclusion: Easy-to-use, good reproducibility, absence of radiation, make the 3D ultrasound an interesting alternative for the 3-month check. The coronal view gives a directly exploitable document for the surgeon.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.03.014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!