Alford pleas in the age of innocence.

Behav Sci Law

School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, U.S.A.

Published: August 2009

In 1970, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in North Carolina v. Alford that has since allowed defendants who do not wish to risk their fates at trial to plead guilty while simultaneously asserting their innocence. Although "Alford pleas" have remained unexamined by researchers, the increasing number of identified wrongful convictions of those factually innocent highlights the need for an in-depth examination of them. In the present study, using the Department of Justice 2004 State Survey of Inmates in Correctional Facilities dataset, we examined the likelihood of entering Alford pleas over traditional guilty, no contest, and not guilty pleas for those convicted of murder/manslaughter. Although we generally found few differences between the three guilty plea types, interesting differences between Alford and not guilty pleas emerged. Implications for actual innocence are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.876DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

alford pleas
8
guilty pleas
8
guilty
5
alford
4
pleas age
4
age innocence
4
innocence 1970
4
1970 supreme
4
supreme court
4
court handed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!