Unlabelled: There are no specific studies evaluating the benefit/risk of antithrombotic prophylactic treatment in patients hospitalised in a palliative care unit. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicians attitudes about antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients in palliative care units and the elements which determined their decisions.
Methods: The clinical data of 4 terminally ill patients were extracted from database of a Palliative Care Unit in France. These 4 patients were selected as they represented several different situations according to the presence or not of major thrombotic risk factors, bleeding risk factors, and request of compassionate care. Through an open questionnaire, fourteen clinicians usually in charge of palliative care patients were individually interviewed about antithrombotic prophylactic therapy for each case of patients.
Results: except in the case of a patient with major thrombotic risk factors, no bleeding risk factor and wishing to receive active care, both the attitudes of clinicians to initiate or continue a prophylactic therapy and the elements which lead to their decisions were heterogeneous at least.
Conclusion: the absence of recommendations based on validated clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of thromboembolism prophylactic treatment in palliative care patients lead to uncertain decisions for clinicians. Added to an objective evaluation of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks factors, the wish of patient to receive or not active care is probably the most important element to consider.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2008.11.021 | DOI Listing |
J Med Econ
January 2025
UNESCO-TWAS, The World Academy of Sciences, Trieste, Italy.
Aim: Dynamic cancer control is a current health system priority, yet methods for achieving it are lacking. This study aims to review the application of system dynamics modeling (SDM) on cancer control and evaluate the research quality.
Methods: Articles were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from the inception of the study to November 15th, 2023.
World J Clin Cases
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku City 385-0051, Nagano, Japan.
Background: Malignant transformation (MT) of mature cystic teratoma (MCT) has a poor prognosis, especially in advanced cases. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has an inhibitory effect on MT.
Case Summary: Herein, we present a case in which CCRT had a reduction effect preoperatively.
The guide extension-facilitated ostial stenting (GEST) technique uses a guide extension catheter (GEC) to improve stent delivery during primary coronary angioplasty (PCI). GECs are used for stent delivery into the coronary arteries of patients with difficult anatomy due to tortuosity, calcification, or chronic total occlusion (CTO) vessels. Stent and balloon placement has become challenging in patients with increasing lesion complexity due to tortuosity, vessel morphology, length of the lesion, and respiratory movements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Reg Health Am
December 2024
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Background: Over the last decade, numerous efforts have been made to combat the opioid crisis globally. The impact of these strategies has not been adequately measured and may differ across populations depending on baseline risk. We compared changes in long-term prescription opioid use following surgery within a national US cohort, between 2017 and 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychooncology
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Families Addressing Cancer Together (FACT), a web-based, individually tailored, psychoeducational intervention for parents with cancer to improve illness-related communication with their minor children.
Methods: Parents with stage I-IV solid tumors who had children ages 3-17 were randomized to 6 weeks of FACT versus waitlist control. Feasibility was assessed by rates of recruitment and retention.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!