Take-off analysis of the Olympic ski jumping competition (HS-106m).

J Biomech

Neuromuscular Research Center, Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

Published: May 2009

AI Article Synopsis

  • The take-off phase of ski jumping at the Torino Olympics was analyzed using high-speed cameras, revealing how altitude and slight tail winds influenced the competition.
  • The study found significant correlations between in-run velocity and jump distance, indicating that better jumpers experienced less friction and had superior aerodynamics.
  • Despite varying take-off techniques, the top athletes achieved similar jump distances, with wind conditions also affecting their performance across different rounds.

Article Abstract

The take-off phase (approximately 6m) of the jumps of all athletes participating in the individual HS-106m hill ski jumping competition at the Torino Olympics was filmed with two high-speed cameras. The high altitude of the Pragelato ski jumping venue (1600m) and slight tail wind in the final jumping round were expected to affect the results of this competition. The most significant correlation with the length of the jump was found in the in-run velocity (r=0.628, p<0.001, n=50). This was a surprise in Olympic level ski jumping, and suggests that good jumpers simply had smaller friction between their skis and the in-run tracks and/or the aerodynamic quality of their in-run position was better. Angular velocity of the hip joint of the best jumpers was also correlated with jumping distance (r=0.651, p<0.05, n=10). The best jumpers in this competition exhibited very different take-off techniques, but still they jumped approximately the same distance. This certainly improves the interests in ski jumping among athletes and spectators. The comparison between the take-off techniques of the best jumpers showed that even though the more marked upper body movement creates higher air resistance, it does not necessarily result in shorter jumping distance if the exposure time to high air resistance is not too long. A comparison between the first and second round jumps of the same jumpers showed that the final results in this competition were at least partly affected by the wind conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ski jumping
12
jumping competition
8
take-off analysis
4
analysis olympic
4
olympic ski
4
jumping
4
competition hs-106m
4
hs-106m take-off
4
take-off phase
4
phase jumps
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!