Nutrition therapy for acute renal failure: a new approach based on 'risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage kidney' classification (RIFLE).

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care

Head Intensive Care Unit, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Holy Heart Clinic, Medellin, Colombia.

Published: May 2009

Purpose Of Review: Critically ill patients are hypermetabolic and have increased nutrient requirements. Although it is assumed that nutritional support is beneficial in this group of patients there are no well designed clinical trials to test this hypothesis. The rationale for nutritional support, therefore, is based upon clinical judgement. Although it is not known how long a critically ill patient can tolerate what is effectively starvation, the loss of lean tissue which occurs in catabolic patients (20-40 g nitrogen/day) suggests that depletion to a critical level may occur after 14 days.

Recent Findings: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a syndrome commonly seen in the ICU. It is usually multifactorial rather than the result of a primary renal disease. The difficulty of adequately defining the syndrome has been addressed by the acute dialysis quality initiative, leading to the risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage kidney (RIFLE) criteria.

Summary: Broad consensus in the diagnosis and management of AKI in critical illness is achievable. Standardization of nutritional support by RIFLE classification is urgently needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32832a2be6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutritional support
12
injury failure
8
failure loss
8
loss end-stage
8
critically ill
8
nutrition therapy
4
therapy acute
4
acute renal
4
renal failure
4
failure approach
4

Similar Publications

Background: Precision nutrition-based methods develop tailored interventions and/or recommendations accounting for determinants of intra- and inter-individual variation in response to the same diet, compared to current 'one-size-fits-all' population-level approaches. Determinants may include genetics, current dietary habits and eating patterns, circadian rhythms, health status, gut microbiome, socioeconomic and psychosocial characteristics, and physical activity. ​​​​In this systematic review, we examined the evidence base for the effect of interventions based on precision nutrition approaches on overweight and obesity in children and adolescents to help inform future research and global guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rapid and accurate methods for tracing and identifying the origin of lamb are crucial for ensuring food authenticity and quality. This study developed a precise traceability method to determine the origin of lamb by integrating rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) with multivariate statistical analysis. Lamb samples from Xilin Gol, Ordos, and Hulun Buir ranches were identified by REIMS fingerprinting within 1 min.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) presents in up to half of adults and one-third of children admitted to Canadian hospitals and significantly impacts health outcomes. Strategies to screen, diagnose and treat DRM exist but policy to facilitate implementation and sustainability are lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore gaps, opportunities, barriers and enablers for DRM policy in Canada.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Due to the challenges of conducting randomised controlled trials (randomised trials) of dietary interventions, evidence in nutrition often comes from non-randomised (observational) studies of nutritional exposures-called nutritional epidemiology studies. When using systematic reviews of such studies to advise patients or populations on optimal dietary habits, users of the evidence (eg, healthcare professionals such as clinicians, health service and policy workers) should first evaluate the rigour (validity) and utility (applicability) of the systematic review. Issues in making this judgement include whether the review addressed a sensible question; included an exhaustive literature search; was scrupulous in the selection of studies and the collection of data; and presented results in a useful manner.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article continues from a prior commentary on evaluating the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials addressing nutritional interventions. Having provided a synopsis of the risk of bias issues, we now address how to understand trial results, including the interpretation of best estimates of effect and the corresponding precision (eg, 95% CIs), as well as the applicability of the evidence to patients based on their unique circumstances (eg, patients' values and preferences when trading off potential desirable and undesirable health outcomes and indicators (eg, cholesterol), and the potential burden and cost of an intervention). Authors can express the estimates of effect for health outcomes and indicators in relative terms (relative risks, relative risk reductions, OR or HRs)-measures that are generally consistent across populations-and absolute terms (risk differences)-measures that are more intuitive to clinicians and patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!