Background: Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy has historically been a controversial topic, and it has been considered by some to be a difficult and unpredictable procedure. Secondary breast augmentation and mastopexy after previous breast surgery is rarely discussed in the literature, and little is known about the outcomes of these secondary procedures.
Objective: The authors present the indications, surgical techniques, and outcomes in a series of 100 consecutive secondary simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy cases.
Methods: One hundred consecutive patients who underwent secondary combined augmentation mammaplasty and mastopexy from 1992 to 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. The complications and revision rates in this group of patients were analyzed and compared with primary mastopexy alone, as well as with primary combined augmentation and mastopexy. Independent variables such as patient age, history of smoking, body mass index, type and size of implant, and type of mastopexy incision were analyzed for correlation with complication and revision rates.
Results: No major complications were noted in an average of 3.5 years follow-up (range 13 months to 13 years). Minor complications occurred in 13 patients, of whom 8 required revision surgery. The most common tissue-related complications were poor scarring (3%) and recurrent ptosis (3%). The most common implant-related complications were infection (3%) and capsular contracture (2%). In addition, 6 patients underwent reoperation for implant size exchange, and 1 patient underwent revision surgery to receive silicone implants. Patient age, history of smoking, body mass index, type and size of implant, type of mastopexy incision, type and number of previous breast surgeries, surgical time, concurrent non-breast operations, and preoperative ptosis grade were not statistically significant risks when correlated to the complication and revision rate.
Conclusions: Simultaneous breast augmentation and mastopexy after previous breast surgery is a commonly performed procedure that is not adequately reported in the literature. Our study indicates that the procedure is safe and has complication and revision rates comparable to primary augmentation/mastopexy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2007.07.003 | DOI Listing |
Aesthetic Plast Surg
December 2024
Plastic Surgeon, Private Practice, Academia de Cirurgia Plàstica, Oporto, Portugal.
Background: Breast augmentation and breast reconstruction with implants are among the most performed surgery worldwide.
Objective: In the search for an ideal implant in terms of safety, shape and consistency, the authors report their experience with a subtype of breast implant, the Diagon\Gel 4Two implants, in both cosmetic and reconstructive cases by analyzing their experience on 116 consecutive patients.
Methods: One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients undergoing both aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using Diagon\Gel 4Two Implants between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed.
Aesthetic Plast Surg
December 2024
Postgraduate School of Plastic Surgery, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Background: Ptotic breast deformity arises from decreased breast tissue volume and skin laxity, causing descent of breast tissue due to gravity. Mastopexy lifts and reshapes the breast and can be potentially associated with breast implants in case of need of volume increase. However, this option is not accepted by all the patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAesthetic Plast Surg
November 2024
Department of Plastic Surgery, The Affiliated Friendship Plastic Surgery Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Background: The increasing demand for correcting ptosis has made mastopexy one of the most common procedures in plastic surgery. While various techniques have been developed, clinical outcomes often require refinement. In this study, we employed an inferolaterally pedicled, tongue-shaped parenchymal flap to perform auto-augmentation mastopexy via periareolar approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
August 2024
From Reshape House, Kent, United Kingdom.
Background: Breast and chest asymmetries are extremely common, and primary augmentation mammoplasty can be challenging in these cases. However, there is a paucity of information on the relative distribution of these asymmetries and the implant sizes used in these patients.
Methods: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive cases of primary augmentation mammoplasty performed by a single surgeon from May 1999 to May 2012 was conducted.
Aesthetic Plast Surg
November 2024
Postgraduate Program in Translational Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo (Unifesp), Rua Botucatu, 740-2º andar, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background: Breast asymmetry occurs when there is a discrepancy in the shape, volume, or positioning of the breasts. Various factors, including unequal development of breast buds, endocrine disorders, chest wall deformities, and surgical or posttraumatic sequelae, can contribute to this condition. Although breast asymmetry is common, clinically severe cases are rare and often require surgical correction because of potential postural, aesthetic, and psychological issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!