Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Although the development of computational models to aid drug discovery has become an integral part of pharmaceutical research, the application of these models often fails to produce the expected impact on productivity. One reason for this may be that the expected performance of many models is simply not supported by the underlying data, because of often neglected effects of assay and prediction errors on the reliability of the predicted outcome. Another significant challenge to realizing the full potential of computational models is their integration into prospective medicinal chemistry campaigns. This article will analyze the impact of assay and prediction error on model quality, and explore scenarios where computational models can expect to have a significant influence on drug discovery research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2009.01.012 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!