Three enantiopure dirhodium tetracarboxylates are compared in their NMR properties to differentiate chiral ligands of various kinds (dirhodium method). The complex with four (S)-2-methoxy-2-(1-naphthyl) propionate (MalphaNP) residues (Rh2) is slightly better for strong donors than the complex with four Mosher acid anions (Rh1), but it is inferior for weak donors. On the other hand, the dirhodium tetracarboxylate complex with four (S)-N-phthaloyl-(S)-tert.-leucinate residues (Rh3) is generally more effective than Rh1. These results are explained by the estimated conformational behavior of the substituents within the equatorial acid residues and the anisotropy (ring-current) effect of aryl groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chir.20706DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dirhodium tetracarboxylates
8
dirhodium method
8
dirhodium
5
comparing chiral
4
chiral dirhodium
4
tetracarboxylates dirhodium
4
method three
4
three enantiopure
4
enantiopure dirhodium
4
tetracarboxylates compared
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!