A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Large area local anesthesia (LALA) in submuscular breast augmentation. | LitMetric

Background: Large area local anesthesia (LALA) has been recommended for decreasing localized pain and shortening discharge time after breast augmentation surgery. However, quantifiable, objective outcome data for evaluation of the effectiveness of LALA in aesthetic plastic surgery procedures have not yet been reported.

Objective: We conducted a retrospective patient chart review to determine whether irrigation of the submuscular pocket with bupivacaine in retropectoral breast augmentation procedures quantifiably alters the patient's postoperative course with respect to narcotic requirement, nausea and vomiting, and time to discharge. The findings were evaluated in the context of a critical review of the literature dealing with pain management after breast augmentation, and in particular with the use of LALA.

Methods: All procedures were performed by the senior author in a private surgical facility. All patients received an identical general anesthetic plus local infiltration of incisions with 1% lidocaine with epinephrine. An inframammary approach was used in all cases; retropectoral dissection was performed with electrocautery dissection followed by hemostasis. In one cohort of patients the submuscular pocket was irrigated with 10 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine before dissection of the contralateral side; in a second control cohort it was not. Postoperative care was the same for both groups.

Results: We found a trend toward decreased nausea and vomiting and narcotic use, and a statistically significant decrease in time to discharge, for the cohort that received intraoperative bupivacaine irrigation.

Conclusions: LALA is an effective means to decrease recovery time and possibly postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and narcotic requirements. Because evidence-based medicine is the surest basis for clinical decisions, evaluation of LALA as well as other treatment modalities should include quantifiable outcome measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2004.06.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast augmentation
16
nausea vomiting
12
large area
8
area local
8
local anesthesia
8
anesthesia lala
8
submuscular pocket
8
time discharge
8
vomiting narcotic
8
lala
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!