AI Article Synopsis

  • Tumour length and degree of oesophageal circumference (DOC) involvement by the tumour are important factors affecting prognosis in oesophageal cancer, but the significance of DOC with or without resection margin invasion was unclear.
  • A study analyzing data from 320 patients who underwent surgery revealed that larger DOC (>2.5 cm) is associated with poorer outcomes, particularly in patients who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • In multivariate analysis, while other factors like age and lymph node metastasis played a more significant role, DOC retained its prognostic value in those not treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, indicating its potential importance in surgical planning.

Article Abstract

Objective: Tumour length is an adverse prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer. However, the prognostic role of the degree of oesophageal circumference (DOC) involved by tumour with or without resection margin invasion is not clear. This work assessed the relationship between DOC involved by tumour, clinico-pathological variables and prognosis.

Methods: The clinico-pathological details of 320 patients who underwent potentially curative oesophagogastrectomy for cancer between 1994 and 2007 were analysed. The DOC involved with tumour measured macroscopically on the resected specimen was classified as small (<2.5 cm, n = 115), large (> or = 2.5 cm, n = 144) or circumferential (i.e. involving the whole circumference, n = 61). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were carried out.

Results: The DOC with tumour was higher in ulcerating tumours than stenosing or polypoidal types (p = 0.017). Tumour length, T-stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and vascular invasion were independently associated with DOC with tumour on multivariate analysis (p < 0.05 for all). DOC > or = 2.5 cm was an adverse prognostic factor in univariate analysis (p = 0.002) with a hazard ratio of 1.52 [95% CI 1.13-2.04] compared with those <2.5 cm. Circumferential tumours had a similar prognosis to tumours > or = 2.5 cm (p = 0.60). The prognostic significance of DOC with tumour was lost in multivariate analysis where the factors retaining independence were patient age, T-stage, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion and positive resection margins. However, when patients were stratified by use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 121), the DOC with tumour retained prognostic significance on multivariate analysis in the 199 patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: The DOC with tumour appears to provide prognostic information in oesophageal cancer surgery, especially in patients who do not undergo preoperative chemotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.12.052DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

doc tumour
20
prognostic factor
12
oesophageal cancer
12
doc involved
12
involved tumour
12
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
12
multivariate analysis
12
tumour
11
doc
9
factor oesophageal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!